Museum 2.0: A study into the culture of expertise within the museum blogosphere

Verboom, Jessica; Arora, Payal

doi:10.5210/fm.v18i8.4538

Cited by 13 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Technology enables the museum an advocate for knowledge (Freedman, 2000) and supports the educational and cultural role of museums in society (MacDonald & Alsford, 1991). Technology is leading to decentralisation and sharing of cultural authority on heritage, driving museums to abandon the exclusive role of a key intermediary of knowledge, enabling the museum staff and experts, motivated individuals and communities to produce museum knowledge in a socially defined context (Verboom & Arora, 2013).…”

Section: Towards a 'Shared Authority' On Cultural Heritage By Developing Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Becoming Social Museums by Being Virtual-Oriented and Technology-Driven Organisations

Romanelli

2021

Culture. Society. Economy. Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As audience-oriented and information-driven organisations, museums are embracing the Internet and interactive technology for developing virtual museums by encouraging the participation of the users in cultural activities. Technology does not exist per se being socially shaped. Museums have the opportunity to promote social innovation by developing technology and opening up to the audience as an active participant in the definition of cultural contents emphasising the interaction and communication between museums and their users. The Internet and interactive technology help museums to drive service innovation by opening up to the participation of the audience in defining cultural heritage contents. As virtual-oriented and technology-driven organisations, museums are becoming social, developing social spaces for innovation, selecting different pathways by managing information and knowledge sharing, developing interactive and virtual technology, building a shared authority on cultural heritage, involving the user as an active participant in co-production of cultural heritage knowledge.

show abstract

Section: Towards a 'Shared Authority' On Cultural Heritage By Developing Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Becoming Social Museums by Being Virtual-Oriented and Technology-Driven Organisations

Romanelli

2021

Culture. Society. Economy. Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Gwybodaeth am ddynodi cymdeithasol (Cho et al, 2012;Owens, 2013); • Trin a thrafod delweddau digidol (Redman, 2007;Schroer, 2012); • Blogio (Verboom & Arora, 2013); • Dealltwriaeth o Hawliau Eiddo Deallusol (IPR) (Tsolis et al, 2011); • Dylunio a defnyddio technoleg 3D (Liritzis et al, 2015;Younan, 2015); a • Dylunio a defnyddio rhithwirionedd a realiti estynedig (Donghui et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2012).…”

Section: Strwythur Yr Adroddiadmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapio Ecosystem Sgiliau Digidol Amgueddfeydd - Adroddiad Cyfnod Un

Barnes¹,

Kispeter²,

Eikhof³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Researchers studying the ways in which media developments affect the heritage sector have focused predominantly on museums and archives (e.g. Proctor 2010; Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt and Aljas 2011; Verboom and Arora 2013;Wellington and Oliver 2015). This is understandable, as these are important institutions for the presentation and preservation of cultural heritage.…”

Section: Institutional Transformations In the Heritage Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Mediatization of Urban Cultural Heritage: Participatory Approaches to Narrating the Urban Past

Hoeven

2017

Dynamics of Mediatization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter examines how the mediatization of cultural heritage enables people to participate in the conservation of the urban past. The ways in which mediatization fosters public involvement in urban heritage conservation will be explored by focusing on three developments: the digitization of heritage collections; the growing attention paid to audience participation by heritage institutions; and the grassroots practices of cultural heritage initiated by citizens. Finally, I discuss how the mediatization of cultural heritage changes the public role of heritage institutions and their professionals. My main argument is that mediatization results in a growing diversity of urban heritage initiatives. However, this process of mediatization feeds into wider developments towards the democratization of cultural heritage. This is a pre-print version of a chapter that has been published in the book 'Dynamics of mediatization: institutional change and everyday transformations in a digital age'. Please cite this chapter as: Van der Hoeven, A. (2017). The mediatization of urban cultural heritage: Participatory approaches to narrating the urban past. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, A. Hepp, S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of mediatization: Institutional change and everyday transformations in a digital age (pp. 293-312). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

show abstract

Museum 2.0: A study into the culture of expertise within the museum blogosphere

Cited by 13 publications

References 21 publications

Becoming Social Museums by Being Virtual-Oriented and Technology-Driven Organisations

Becoming Social Museums by Being Virtual-Oriented and Technology-Driven Organisations

Mapio Ecosystem Sgiliau Digidol Amgueddfeydd - Adroddiad Cyfnod Un

The Mediatization of Urban Cultural Heritage: Participatory Approaches to Narrating the Urban Past

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About