Muscles in “Concert”: Study of Primary Motor Cortex Upper Limb Functional Topography

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) have focused on the cortical representation of limited group of muscles. No attempts have been carried out so far to get simultaneous recordings from hand, forearm and arm with TMS in order to disentangle a ‘functional’ map providing information on the rules orchestrating muscle coupling and overlap. The aim of the present study is to disentangle functional associations between 12 upper limb muscles using two measures: cortical overlapping and cortical covariation of each pair of muscles. Interhemispheric differences and the influence of posture were evaluated as well.Methodology/Principal FindingsTMS mapping studies of 12 muscles belonging to hand, forearm and arm were performed. Findings demonstrate significant differences between the 66 pairs of muscles in terms of cortical overlapping: extremely high for hand-forearm muscles and very low for arm vs hand/forearm muscles. When right and left hemispheres were compared, overlapping between all possible pairs of muscles in the left hemisphere (62.5%) was significantly higher than in the right one (53.5% ).The arm/hand posture influenced both measures of cortical association, the effect of Position being significant [p = .021] on overlapping, resulting in 59.5% with prone vs 53.2% with supine hand, but only for pairs of muscles belonging to hand and forearm, while no changes occurred in the overlapping of proximal muscles with those of more distal districts.Conclusions/SignificanceLarger overlapping in the left hemisphere could be related to its lifetime higher training of all twelve muscles studied with respect to the right hemisphere, resulting in larger intra-cortical connectivity within primary motor cortex. Altogether, findings with prone hand might be ascribed to mechanisms facilitating coupling of muscles for object grasping and lifting -with more proximal involvement for joint stabilization- compared to supine hand facilitating actions like catching. TMS multiple-muscle mapping studies permit a better understanding of motor control and ‘plastic’ reorganization of motor system.

Measurement Structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: Implications for Motor Control Theory

“…53 Recent cortical stimulation studies show highly interconnected and overlapping movement representations throughout the motor cortex. 54 Taken together, these observations suggest an interdependence and integration of the reach and grasp neuromotor processes, which could explain the strong 2-factor CFA interfactor correlation seen here and supports WMFT unidimensionality.…”

“…For example, the strong 2-factor CFA interfactor correlation may suggest the integration of the visuomotor neural pathways underlying reach and grasp 2,15,50,52,54,61 ; the item difficulty hierarchy may suggest a progression of task difficulty, proceeding from more simple (single joint) to more complex (multiple joint), and further may be related to the information processing requirements of the task (ie, amount of precision, number of performance steps, and biomechanical load). 2,6,7,23,56-58 …”

The role of the peripheral and central nervous systems in rotator cuff disease

“…Little is known about the cortical organization of motoneurons related to proximal muscles of the arm, and even less regarding RC muscles 99 . Functional MRI has been previously used but is not discriminant for motor cortical mapping of individual RC muscles 73 .…”

Movement-induced uncoupling of primary sensory and motor areas in focal task-specific hand dystonia

“…Moreover, the powers of these two sources and their functional connectivity in the gamma band selectively depended on the performance level constituting a sensorimotor feedback efficiency index estimating the continuous functional balance between primary sensory and motor areas devoted to hand control (Tecchio et al, 2008a). While the primary motor cortex could have been studied by means of TMS, which is a very powerful technique to investigate motor system input-output relationships (Rossini and Pauri, 2000;Rossini et al, 2003Rossini and Rossi, 2007;Melgari et al, 2008), we decided to use MEG to allow for parallel and separate assessments of M1 and S1 rhythms during the performance of a simple voluntary movement.…”