2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle Weakness and Walking Slowness for the Identification of Sarcopenia in the Older Adults from Northern Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of sarcopenia in elderly people from Northern Brazil according to muscle weakness or walking slowness. Methods: The sample consisted of 312 elderly people (72.6 ± 7.8 years). For walking slowness, a gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s was used as a cut-off value, and for muscle weakness the following handgrip strength criteria were used for men and women, respectively: CI: <27.0/16.0 kg; CII: <35.5/20.0 kg; CIII: grip strength corrected for body mass index (BMI) &l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grouping of these variables to classify people based on the observation of similarities and dissimilarities concerning sarcopenia thus proved to be different for men and women. Gait slowness was more prevalent in women than men, while muscle weakness was more prevalent in men in our sample [ 28 ]. These observations may be due to a lower gait speed in women and a more significant age-related decline in muscle mass/strength in men [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grouping of these variables to classify people based on the observation of similarities and dissimilarities concerning sarcopenia thus proved to be different for men and women. Gait slowness was more prevalent in women than men, while muscle weakness was more prevalent in men in our sample [ 28 ]. These observations may be due to a lower gait speed in women and a more significant age-related decline in muscle mass/strength in men [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%