1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199907)22:7<946::aid-mus22>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle vibration: Different effects on transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature has well established that periods of augmented sensory input introduced with vibration markedly increase the excitability of neural circuits that control the motor output to the stimulated muscle [9][10][11]18,[22][23][24]. The increased MEP size found in the current study is consistent with such reports and in addition demonstrated expansion of the cortical representation area associated with the vibrated ECRL muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Literature has well established that periods of augmented sensory input introduced with vibration markedly increase the excitability of neural circuits that control the motor output to the stimulated muscle [9][10][11]18,[22][23][24]. The increased MEP size found in the current study is consistent with such reports and in addition demonstrated expansion of the cortical representation area associated with the vibrated ECRL muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, we found that vibration-induced cortical modulation was sustained up to 5 min beyond the 15 min stimulation period. Arguably, we did not examine whether the changes could have been due to alterations in spinal excitability alone, although many others have provided convincing evidence that vibration applied as in the current study results in modulations at the cortical level [9][10]18,20]. For example, Kossev and colleagues showed that MEP facilitation induced by muscle vibration was evident after TMS but not transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these increases are considered due to increased excitability of spinal mechanisms (Claus et al 1988a;. In addition, recent studies comparing the effect of afferent input on responses to TMS have suggested that peripheral electrical and vibration stimulation influence the excitability of cortical mechanisms (Kossev et al 1999;Rosenkranz and Rothwell 2003). Although we cannot exclude spinal contributions to these results, our data on SICI, ICF, and MRCP are compatible with additional action on the MI.…”
Section: Primary Motor Cortex Excitability At Rest (Tms Study)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…29 Indeed, motor-evoked potential amplitudes in arm musculature are augmented by TV as early as 0.5 s after the onset of TV, 30 a response that is attributed to increased cortical activation. 31 The optimum frequency to evoke the response lies near 75 Hz, 32 the vibratory and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e-Publications@Marquette. SAGE Publications does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from SAGE Publications.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms For Improved Arm Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%