2020
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle Typology of World-Class Cyclists across Various Disciplines and Events

Abstract: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise ® Published ahead of Print contains articles in unedited manuscript form that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. This manuscript will undergo copyediting, page composition, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered that could affect the content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the fact that high proportions of type-I fibers are suggested to display greater mechanical efficiency at common movement frequencies (i.e., 1–2Hz, e.g., cycling between 60 and 120 rpm) that are close to the type-I fiber's peak efficiency velocity (He et al, 2000 ; Joyner and Coyle, 2008 ), a higher percentage of type-I fibers would relate to a higher gross efficiency (Coyle et al, 1992 ; Horowitz et al, 1994 ), and therefore contributes to a higher endurance performance (Horowitz et al, 1994 ). Nowadays, non-invasive techniques such as 1 H-MRS measurements of muscle carnosine content are also used to estimate type-I and II muscle typology, thereby confirming prior muscle biopsy-based findings across athletes (Baguet et al, 2011 ; Bex et al, 2017 ; Lievens et al, 2020 , 2021 ).…”
Section: The Overlooked Underlying Physiology: Skeletal Muscle Determinants Of Endurance Performancementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Given the fact that high proportions of type-I fibers are suggested to display greater mechanical efficiency at common movement frequencies (i.e., 1–2Hz, e.g., cycling between 60 and 120 rpm) that are close to the type-I fiber's peak efficiency velocity (He et al, 2000 ; Joyner and Coyle, 2008 ), a higher percentage of type-I fibers would relate to a higher gross efficiency (Coyle et al, 1992 ; Horowitz et al, 1994 ), and therefore contributes to a higher endurance performance (Horowitz et al, 1994 ). Nowadays, non-invasive techniques such as 1 H-MRS measurements of muscle carnosine content are also used to estimate type-I and II muscle typology, thereby confirming prior muscle biopsy-based findings across athletes (Baguet et al, 2011 ; Bex et al, 2017 ; Lievens et al, 2020 , 2021 ).…”
Section: The Overlooked Underlying Physiology: Skeletal Muscle Determinants Of Endurance Performancementioning
confidence: 79%
“…This technique clearly discriminated the muscle typology of different athletes by confirming that all explosive athletes had the highest carnosine levels and thus, a greater estimated proportion of type II fibres, compared to endurance athletes, with intermediate athletes always situated between these two groups 12 . More recently 13 , we demonstrated prominent differences in the muscle typology of elite and world-class cyclists competing in various disciplines. Interestingly, we did not observe such prominent differences in the muscle typology in a cohort of 11 trained swimmers 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Muscle carnosine content was measured by 1 H-MRS in the gastrocnemius medialis and soleus muscle of each participants right limb to estimate muscle typology 11 . 1 H-MRS measurements were performed on a 3-T whole body MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems Best, The Netherlands) as previously described 13,16 . The carnosine concentration of each muscle was converted to a sex-specific Z-score relative to an age-and sex-matched control population of active, healthy non-athletes, consisting of 40 men and 33 women.…”
Section: Muscle Carnosine Quantification By 1 H-mrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The test is commonly performed over 30 s, but may range from 4-60 s. From this test, PPO, time to PPO, average power for the test-duration and fatigue index (based on a ratio of peak and average power) are measured [ 67 ]. The use of a laboratory test allows easy measurement of blood, expired gases, muscle biopsy, electromyography, and most recently proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy [ 69 ].…”
Section: -60 S Sprint Performancementioning
confidence: 99%