2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle-tendon units provide limited contributions to the passive stiffness of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept that the degree of joint laxity of any one individual is generalized throughout the body and that the majority of the stiffness of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand is a result of the capsule ligament complex and not the muscle-tendon units supports this view [30], as well as reported high correlations between finger joint laxity and general joint mobility measures [27,31,32]. In parallel, a constitutional connective tissue weakness in the pelvic region is suggested as a cause in women presenting with genitourinary prolapse and urinary incontinence [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept that the degree of joint laxity of any one individual is generalized throughout the body and that the majority of the stiffness of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand is a result of the capsule ligament complex and not the muscle-tendon units supports this view [30], as well as reported high correlations between finger joint laxity and general joint mobility measures [27,31,32]. In parallel, a constitutional connective tissue weakness in the pelvic region is suggested as a cause in women presenting with genitourinary prolapse and urinary incontinence [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMAS is often differentiated from active musculoarticular stiffness that is generated by contractile structures of the muscles and reflex pathways (Detrembleur and Plaghki, 2000). For its part, PMAS is due to the rheological properties of non-contractile elements such as muscle-tendon units, aponeurosis, and capsuloligamentous complex (Leger and Milner, 2000;Kuo and Deshpande, 2012). Furthermore, Riemann and Schmitz described that PMAS included the contribution from all the tissues located around and within the joint, such as muscle-tendon units, skin, subcutaneous tissues, facias, ligaments, joint capsule, and cartilage (Riemann and Schmitz, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the finger moves through a large range of motion in our simulation, it is unfitting to directly compare the induced joint reaction forces. This is because the finger joint reaction forces are also significantly affected by the finger pose due to the considerable forces required to stretch the passive structures at the joints and to overcome the effects of damping and system inertia [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Virtual prototyping framework illustrating the virtual design and control of an index finger exoskeleton using biomechanical, morphological, and controller performance measures preliminary prototype of the device. A linear passive rotational stiffness and damping element was added to the three index finger joints to represent the passive contributions from ligaments and other structures [34,35]. Also, linear spring elements (k 1 -k 4 in Fig.…”
Section: Initialmentioning
confidence: 99%