2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000196475.40151.8b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle Strength Improves after Abductor-sparing Periacetabular Osteotomy

Abstract: Prognostic study, Level II (lesser quality prospective study--eg, patients enrolled at different points in their disease or < 80% followup). See the Guidelines for Authors a complete description of levels of evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
5
Order By: Relevance
“…16 We have previously noted that the mean muscle strengths at one year after operation, as measured by the percentage differences of pre-operative values relative to the post-operative state, were 42.2 Nm (129.6%) for the abductor, 39.4 Nm (131.4%) for the adductor, 48.4 Nm (121%) for the flexor and 45.8 Nm (130.5%) for the extensor, all of which exceeded the pre-operative values before curved periacetabular osteotomy. [40][41][42][43] The good results in the present study may be due to the preservation of the gluteal muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…16 We have previously noted that the mean muscle strengths at one year after operation, as measured by the percentage differences of pre-operative values relative to the post-operative state, were 42.2 Nm (129.6%) for the abductor, 39.4 Nm (131.4%) for the adductor, 48.4 Nm (121%) for the flexor and 45.8 Nm (130.5%) for the extensor, all of which exceeded the pre-operative values before curved periacetabular osteotomy. [40][41][42][43] The good results in the present study may be due to the preservation of the gluteal muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The preoperative muscle strength was an essential factor in postoperative muscle strength recovery in patients with DDH, for whom abductor-sparing periacetabular Osteotomy was performed [32]. The posterolateral approach, which has a lesser disruption of abductor musculature and more anatomic dissection [33], should be adopt in patients with DDH performed THA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 a The custom cutting guide was fixed with three Kirschner wires and the fitting to the pelvis was confirmed using an image intensifier. b The cutting line can be confirmed with an oblique view of the pelvis preservation of abductor muscle strength [23] and blood supply to the rotated acetabulum, and a short skin incision. In addition, the osteotomy is spherical and can avoid anterior overcorrection and non-union of the rotated acetabulum [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%