1982
DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90347-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle spindle formation and differentiation in regenerating rat muscle grafts

Abstract: Muscle spindle development and function are dependent upon sensory innervation. During muscle regeneration, both neural and muscul.ar components of spindles degenerate and it is not known whether reinnervation of a regenerating muscle results in Ireestablishment of proper neuromuscular relationships within spindles or whether sensory neurons may exert an influence upon differentiation of these spindles. Muscle spindle regeneration was studied in bupivacainetreated grafts of rat extensor digitorum longus (EDL) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regenerated intrafusal fibres, however, had not differentiated into intrafusal fibre types and exhibited a reaction typical of extrafusal fibres. Similarly, as in most spindles in standard free autografts (Rogers and Carlson 1981;Rogers 1982;Soukup 1988;Cui and Walro 1989;Walro et al 1989;Soukup et al 1990a), afferent axons failed to reinnervate the spindles in our experiments. The lack of nuclear accumulations, the reduced size of the periaxial space and the larger diameters of regenerated intrafusal fibres also indicate that regenerated spindles in our material are like most regenerated spindles (except those found in nerve-intact grafts -48% of spindles according to Quick and Rogers 1983), devoid of the sensory innervation that is essential for their recovery (Zelenfi 1994) and become inappropriately reinnervated by extrafusal motor axons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regenerated intrafusal fibres, however, had not differentiated into intrafusal fibre types and exhibited a reaction typical of extrafusal fibres. Similarly, as in most spindles in standard free autografts (Rogers and Carlson 1981;Rogers 1982;Soukup 1988;Cui and Walro 1989;Walro et al 1989;Soukup et al 1990a), afferent axons failed to reinnervate the spindles in our experiments. The lack of nuclear accumulations, the reduced size of the periaxial space and the larger diameters of regenerated intrafusal fibres also indicate that regenerated spindles in our material are like most regenerated spindles (except those found in nerve-intact grafts -48% of spindles according to Quick and Rogers 1983), devoid of the sensory innervation that is essential for their recovery (Zelenfi 1994) and become inappropriately reinnervated by extrafusal motor axons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Within the preserved spindle capsules and inside the original intrafusal basal laminae which serve as a scaffolding for regeneration, intrafusal fibres regenerate from intrafusal satellite cells (Milburn 1976;Rogers 1982;Diwan and Milburn 1986). The myosatellites activated during the stage of fibre degeneration divide and fill the persisting basal laminae of the intrafusal fibres with myoblasts, which fuse to form myotubes and further mature into myofibres (Diwan and Milburn 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, though there is intramuscular degeneration of sensory and motor axons and their endings, the endoneurial tubes are left intact and serve to direct neural regrowth along the original pathways. Details of the processes undergone by extrafusal muscle fibres in the rat and cat have been described in numerous studies (see reviews by Carlson 1983Carlson , 1986) and similar information has more recently been provided for intrafusal muscle fibres in the rat (Rogers & Carlson, 1981;Rogers, 1982;Diwan & Milburn, 1986; see also review by Barker & Milburn, 1984). Since regenerated muscle spindles vary considerably in structure and innervation, Diwan and Milburn (1986) classified them into four groups according to degree of abnormality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%