2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-006-1776-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle sparing thoracotomy in pediatric age: a comparative study with standard posterolateral thoracotomy

Abstract: Alternative approaches to the standard posterolateral incision for thoracotomy have been developed to minimize its postoperative pain and wound related side effects. Muscle-sparing (MS) thoracotomy has been a well-known substitution to the standard posterolateral thoracotomy for this purpose; however it has not been studied in the pediatric age group in detail. We studied retrospectively the patients with thoracotomy for non-cardiac, thoracic surgical procedures. Group 1 included the patients with standard pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These complications are significantly increased in comparison to a muscle-sparing thoracotomy, including scoliosis (16%-30% vs 2.5%), shoulder elevation (30% vs 7.5%), winged scapula (38% vs 12.5%), and asymmetric nipples (40% vs 12.5%) [10]. One report suggests that the high complication rate associated with posterolateral thoracotomy may be related to increased neurogenic and muscular damage [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complications are significantly increased in comparison to a muscle-sparing thoracotomy, including scoliosis (16%-30% vs 2.5%), shoulder elevation (30% vs 7.5%), winged scapula (38% vs 12.5%), and asymmetric nipples (40% vs 12.5%) [10]. One report suggests that the high complication rate associated with posterolateral thoracotomy may be related to increased neurogenic and muscular damage [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the results obtained with VATS are similar to those obtained with thoracotomy, with the advantages of better visualization of mediastinal structures, less postoperative pain, reduced hospital stay, and excellent cosmetic results [5]. In addition, this minimally invasive approach can prevent the complications of classic thoracotomy, such as scoliosis, shoulder elevation, winged scapula (scapula alata), or chest wall asymmetry [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many of the studies advocating the MST approach have shown that compared with a PLT, patients experienced less postoperative pain, improved shoulder strength and mobility, and demonstrated better preservation of lung function. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] However, other studies showed no significant differences in these outcomes when comparing the 2 surgical techniques. 1,[13][14][15][16][17] Critics of the MST technique imply that differences in outcomes are not clinically significant or can be attributed to advancements in surgical techniques and anesthesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[29][30][31][32][33] The LD muscle, when preserved, can solely provide adequate reach and bulk of vascularized tissue to address most postlobectomy complications. Although the importance of preservation of the extrathoracic chest muscles for rotational flaps in the event of a postresectional complication has been emphasized in numerous other studies, 1,2,11,12,14,17,34,35 the MST is still not widely utilized. When the LD muscle has been divided, another reconstructive flap option is the serratus anterior muscle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%