2001
DOI: 10.1080/028443101750523131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle repair after a transsection injury with development of a gap: an experimental study in rats

Abstract: Lacerated muscle needs fusion with muscle fibres to regain good function, but it often lose its elasticity and the repair seems poor. We think that the scar healing is caused by the development of a gap. In this study in 20 rats we made silicone tube models to keep a constant distance between the muscle ends, and examined the repair inside the silicone tube. In the short gap (1 mm), aligned collagen fibres and muscle fibres bridged both ends. However, when the gap was long (4 mm) they could not bridge both end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self regeneration is limited in these cases because the remaining myofibers are unable to bridge the gap created by the injury. Any attempt in regeneration results in scar tissue formation in the area of injury or the muscle remodels such that the area of injury becomes permanently devoid of tissue [156, 157]. When evaluating muscle healing capacity in rats, Merritt et al created 0.5 cm × 1 cm or 1 cm × 1 cm full thickness defects in the rat gastrocnemius and found that smaller defects healed by 14 days while the larger defects exhibited no functional recovery after 28 days [157].…”
Section: Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self regeneration is limited in these cases because the remaining myofibers are unable to bridge the gap created by the injury. Any attempt in regeneration results in scar tissue formation in the area of injury or the muscle remodels such that the area of injury becomes permanently devoid of tissue [156, 157]. When evaluating muscle healing capacity in rats, Merritt et al created 0.5 cm × 1 cm or 1 cm × 1 cm full thickness defects in the rat gastrocnemius and found that smaller defects healed by 14 days while the larger defects exhibited no functional recovery after 28 days [157].…”
Section: Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating muscle healing capacity in rats, Merritt et al created 0.5 cm × 1 cm or 1 cm × 1 cm full thickness defects in the rat gastrocnemius and found that smaller defects healed by 14 days while the larger defects exhibited no functional recovery after 28 days [157]. Similarly, Terada et al looked at muscle regeneration in rats in which the ends of lacerated muscle fibers were kept either 1 mm or 4 mm apart using silicone tubes [156]. It was found that muscle fibers were able to bridge the 1 mm gaps with well-aligned collagen fibers.…”
Section: Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Termed volumetric muscle loss (VML), the bulk loss of muscle tissue (>20% by mass) overwhelms the capacity for regeneration, leading to the formation of non-contractile scar tissue at the defect site and functional impairment for the patient (Grogan and others 2011; Terada and others 2001). The poor clinical outcome following VML injury combined with a lack of effective treatment options motivates our exploration of VML regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strains, contusions, and lacerations) cells may be injured, but the underlying extracellular matrix (ECM) is largely intact and repair is robust [1, 2]. However, when significant muscle volume is lost (trauma or surgical resection) the physical and chemical cues provided by the ECM are absent and the defect is instead replaced with non-contractile scar tissue [3]. The current standard of care to replace severely damaged or missing muscle is the transfer of autologous muscle flaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%