1999
DOI: 10.1519/00124278-199908000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle Power and Fiber Characteristics Following 8 Weeks of Plyometric Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
55
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
55
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…No approach steps were permitted, but a countermovement jump was used prior to takeoff [26]. A 3-min recovery was provided between jumps [51]. Similar to the inertial load cycling test, the vertical jump test provided information on participants' muscle fiber composition.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No approach steps were permitted, but a countermovement jump was used prior to takeoff [26]. A 3-min recovery was provided between jumps [51]. Similar to the inertial load cycling test, the vertical jump test provided information on participants' muscle fiber composition.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some studies have suggested a rest period of 3 min between jumps in order to ensure phosphocreatine resynthesis. Future studies may benefit from using the same recovery time [10,15]. Also of note was that each participant finished vertical jump testing within 15 min or less.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the research on CT utilized a protocol involving a strength exercise followed by a power exercise [1,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, few studies have been conducted using an initial power exercise instead of the more often used strength exercise in the complex pair [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the lower intensity might explain why we found only slight increases in the performance variables from pre-to posttesting. Other studies used participants with higher fitness levels (athletes) who therefore could sustain a higher intensity program (Chimera et al, 2004;Gehri et al, 1998;Jensen & Ebben, 2003;Luebbers et al, 2003;Potteiger et al, 1999;Stemm, 1993). Future studies should investigate using untrained versus trained participants in the aquatic setting while also using a 6-to 10-week plyometric program to determine which training period is more effective and to determine whether concurrent strength-training regimens of trained athletes promote better outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%