Muscle fiber number in biceps brachii in bodybuilders and control subjects

Abstract

Muscle fiber numbers were estimated in vivo in biceps brachii in 5 elite male bodybuilders, 7 intermediate caliber bodybuilders, and 13 age-matched controls. Mean fiber area and collagen volume density were calculated from needle biopsies and muscle cross-sectional area by computerized tomographic scanning. Contralateral measurements in a subsample of seven subjects indicated the method for estimation of fiber numbers to have adequate reliability. There was a wide interindividual range for fiber numbers in biceps (172,085-418,884), but despite large differences in muscle size both bodybuilder groups possessed the same number of muscle fibers as the group of untrained controls. Although there was a high correlation between average cross-sectional fiber area and total muscle cross-sectional area within each group, many of the subjects with the largest muscles also tended to have a large number of fibers. Since there were equally well-trained subjects with fewer than normal fiber numbers, we interpret this finding to be due to genetic endowment rather than to training-induced hyperplasia. The proportion of muscle comprised of connective and other noncontractile tissue was the same for all subjects (approximately 13%), thus indicating greater absolute amounts of connective tissue in the trained subjects. We conclude that in humans, heavy resistance training directed toward achieving maximum size in skeletal muscle does not result in an increase in fiber numbers.

Genetic polymorphisms of the enzymes involved in DNA methylation and synthesis in elite athletes

“…The primary mechanisms involved in muscle mass increase are the proliferative activation (22,23) and myogenic differentiation of mononuclear satellite cells that fuse with the enlarging myofiber, as well as an increased protein synthesis (10,14,30), although some evidence is present that hyperplasia of existing muscle fibers also plays a role in muscle enlargement along with hypertrophy alone (1).…”

The Effect of Exercise Training on Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

“…MacDougall et al (MacDougall, Sale et al 1984) investigated possible muscle fiber hyperplasia in the biceps of 12 male body builders in comparison with 13…”

Satellite cell depletion prevents fiber hypertrophy in skeletal muscle

“…Muscle mass can vary considerably, and is modified by hormones, disuse, strength exercise or experimental overload (Egner et al, 2013;Eriksson et al, 2005;Gundersen, 2011;Herbst and Bhasin, 2004). Muscle mass is mainly altered by changing the size of pre-existing muscle fibers, and fiber loss or de novo formation of fibers is believed to play a much lesser role Gollnick et al, 1981;MacDougall et al, 1984;Taylor and Wilkinson, 1986;White et al, 2010).…”