Skeletal Muscle Plasticity in Health and Disease
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-5177-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle Architecture and Adaptations to Functional Requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we lack the necessary data to discern the relative roles of hypertrophy versus hyperplasia, two anecdotal pieces of evidence suggest that hypertrophy is not fully responsible for the observed differences in jaw-muscle mass between tufted and untufted capuchins. First, muscle hypertrophy typically involves increases in pinnation angle given that the larger fibers must be spatially accommodated within an existing myotendinous aponeurosis (Narici and Maganaris, 2006). The jaw muscles of tufted capuchins, however, did not exhibit significantly greater pinnation angles (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we lack the necessary data to discern the relative roles of hypertrophy versus hyperplasia, two anecdotal pieces of evidence suggest that hypertrophy is not fully responsible for the observed differences in jaw-muscle mass between tufted and untufted capuchins. First, muscle hypertrophy typically involves increases in pinnation angle given that the larger fibers must be spatially accommodated within an existing myotendinous aponeurosis (Narici and Maganaris, 2006). The jaw muscles of tufted capuchins, however, did not exhibit significantly greater pinnation angles (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, their analysis did not include changes in muscle architecture or specific tension, which are known to strongly influence maximal force (cf. Fitts et al 2001, Narici & Maganaris 2007 for reviews).…”
Section: Electromyographic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst MRI provides good resolution of anatomical cross‐sectional area of muscle, allowing for distinction between muscle, fat and connective tissue, this does not tell us anything about the alignment of the muscle fibres. Here developments in ultrasound imaging allow fascicles to be identified and measured in terms of their lengths and their angles of pennation (see Narici & Maganaris, 2006). Following strength training, increases in the region of 10% may be expected in terms of anatomical cross‐sectional area of the quadriceps, as determined by MRI (Aagaard et al 2001).…”
Section: Functional Implications Of Increasing Muscle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%