1974
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscarinic Cholinergic Binding in Rat Brain

Abstract: Binding sites with high affinity and spec- Identification of neurotransmitter receptor sites by chemical measurements of direct binding has been reported for nicotinic cholinergic receptors of invertebrate electric organs (1), mammalian neuromuscular junction (2) and central nervous system (3), and for the glycine receptor in the mammalian central nervous system (4). Attempts to study the muscarinic cholinergic receptor biochemically have involved measuring the binding of atropine to the guinea pig intestine (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

25
226
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 886 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
25
226
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrophysiological consequences of muscarinic receptor activation in central neurones show a qualitative similarity to those in ganglia (see, for example, Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963;Curtis & Ryall, 1966;Krnjevic, 1969;Krnjevic, Pumain & Renaud, 1971;Dingledine, Dodd & Kelly, 1977), but are more difficult to quantify. In consequence, central receptors have so far been characterized primarily from measurements of radiolabelled ligand-binding (Yamamura & Snyder, 1974a. Although these are difficult to correlate directly with the pharmacological response of intact central neurones, our experiments on sympathetic ganglia suggest that the ligand-binding properties of the central muscarinic receptor probably reflect their functional characteristics fairly accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The electrophysiological consequences of muscarinic receptor activation in central neurones show a qualitative similarity to those in ganglia (see, for example, Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963;Curtis & Ryall, 1966;Krnjevic, 1969;Krnjevic, Pumain & Renaud, 1971;Dingledine, Dodd & Kelly, 1977), but are more difficult to quantify. In consequence, central receptors have so far been characterized primarily from measurements of radiolabelled ligand-binding (Yamamura & Snyder, 1974a. Although these are difficult to correlate directly with the pharmacological response of intact central neurones, our experiments on sympathetic ganglia suggest that the ligand-binding properties of the central muscarinic receptor probably reflect their functional characteristics fairly accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…5 The rank order of PLD activity in rat brain was hippocampus>brain stem>cortex>cerebellum (data not shown), and this result is compatible with the previous report. 23 Interestingly, this distribution pattern resembles that of choline acetyltransferase 24 rather than that of PLC, 16 suggesting the significance of PLD in acetylcholine synthesis in brain. The decrease in PLD activity after brain ischemia also might cause an imbalance of acetylcholine turnover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The muscarinic receptor has been studied in detail with respect to its binding with muscarinic ligands by using [3H]-labeled ligands (3,12) and several subclasses with different affinities for agonists (2) or selective antagonists (8) have been reported. It is not known, however, whether these subclasses represent several types of receptors which differ as chemical entities, or several states of a single receptor which differ in conformation and/or in interaction with other components in the membranes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%