2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.64.013014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muon anomalous magnetic moment: A harbinger for “new physics”

Abstract: QED, Hadronic, and Electroweak Standard Model contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, a µ ≡ (g µ − 2)/2, and their theoretical uncertainties are scrutinized. The status and implications of the recently reported 2.6 sigma experiment vs. theory deviation a exp µ − a SM µ = 426(165) × 10 −11 are discussed. Possible explanations due to supersymmetric loop effects with m SUSY ≃ 55 √ tan β GeV, radiative mass mechanisms at the 1-2 TeV scale and other "New Physics" scenarios are examined.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
454
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 471 publications
(464 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
10
454
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impressive accuracy of the theoretical and experimental results renders a µ a high precision observable extremely sensitive to physics beyond the SM. Explaining this deviation has motivated extensive studies -not only taking into account the many possible (higher order) SM corrections, but also exploring new physics contributions capable of saturating the observed discrepancy [60]. Singlet extensions of the SM have been considered to address the (g −2) µ discrepancy; for instance, standard seesaws have been investigated [61], low-scale supersymmetric seesaw models (including right-handed neutrino superfields) [62], as well as B − L (Inverse Seesaw) extensions of the SM [63], among many others.…”
Section: Sterile Neutrinos and Lepton Magnetic Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impressive accuracy of the theoretical and experimental results renders a µ a high precision observable extremely sensitive to physics beyond the SM. Explaining this deviation has motivated extensive studies -not only taking into account the many possible (higher order) SM corrections, but also exploring new physics contributions capable of saturating the observed discrepancy [60]. Singlet extensions of the SM have been considered to address the (g −2) µ discrepancy; for instance, standard seesaws have been investigated [61], low-scale supersymmetric seesaw models (including right-handed neutrino superfields) [62], as well as B − L (Inverse Seesaw) extensions of the SM [63], among many others.…”
Section: Sterile Neutrinos and Lepton Magnetic Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305] (among others). One obvious question addressed in a number of these analyses is if an upper limit on superpartner masses could be deduced assuming there is such a deviation; in looking for such an upper limit one can of course drop the phase dependence.…”
Section: Dipole Moment Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is able to explain the current 3.6σ disagreement between theory and experiment of the muon (g-2) anomalous magnetic moment by introducing new particles in the loops [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Supersymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%