2005
DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epi041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Munitions of the Mind: a History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past two decades, scholars have produced a comprehensive body of literature dealing with these two themes. Much of what Seib writes here restates prevailing arguments with respect to the tensions which exist between the media and the military (see, for instance, Carruthers, 2011;Knightley, 2004;Parry and Goddard, 2017;Taylor, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Over the past two decades, scholars have produced a comprehensive body of literature dealing with these two themes. Much of what Seib writes here restates prevailing arguments with respect to the tensions which exist between the media and the military (see, for instance, Carruthers, 2011;Knightley, 2004;Parry and Goddard, 2017;Taylor, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is even being suggested that propaganda had its roots 2,400 years ago in 'The Art of War' by Sun-tzu (Knightley, 2004). There is however some uniformity amongst some propaganda scholars in terms of its organised and scientific usage during World War 1 where enemy opinion-forming activities were referred to as propaganda and full of lies (Knightley, 2004, Walton 1997, Taylor, 2003. Walton (1997) presumes that the term propaganda did not connote negativity by (one of its early inventers), the Catholic Church.…”
Section: Propaganda and The Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walton (1997) presumes that the term propaganda did not connote negativity by (one of its early inventers), the Catholic Church. However, propaganda has with time been associated with negativity because of its historical function of fuelling fear, hypocrisy and ignorance (Taylor, 2003). Jowett and O'Donnell (2012) argue that propaganda is a communication that attempts to achieve a response to further the preferred intention of the sender of the message.…”
Section: Propaganda and The Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parting from the perspective of one-way communication (Web 1.0) and becoming interactive (Web 2.0) it enabled two-way communication [8], often based on the reciprocity rule and enabled building a competitive advantage in the context of electronic communication with the use of social media [35]. With such potential to impact the audience and spread across the mainstream media scene, social media became a powerful weapon not only for info-wars [36], but also to promote the causes and consequently trigger social changes [37].…”
Section: Social Media As a Double-edged Swordmentioning
confidence: 99%