2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: A case study from Songkhla, Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, an SLF site selection is conceived from four perspectives: technical, environmental, social, and economic, plus the constraints. Similar studies have been carried out by Kamdar et al (2019), Karasan et al (2019), Pasalari et al 2019, Saatsaz et al (2018), among others. Then, there is the meso-scale, or second level, which looks at those variables that play a significant role into the SLF site selection, called criteria (factors and constraints).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Here, an SLF site selection is conceived from four perspectives: technical, environmental, social, and economic, plus the constraints. Similar studies have been carried out by Kamdar et al (2019), Karasan et al (2019), Pasalari et al 2019, Saatsaz et al (2018), among others. Then, there is the meso-scale, or second level, which looks at those variables that play a significant role into the SLF site selection, called criteria (factors and constraints).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This method is based on Eq. (1) [23], where S represents site suitability of the area, W i is the final weight of the criteria, X i is the Fuzzy value of the criteria, and n represents the number of criteria [24].…”
Section: The Fuzzy Logic Approach Based On Wlcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the MCDM approach that provides the highest success in solving the region-based location selection problem should be investigated. In the literature, various MCDM methods were integrated with GIS and it was observed that they were presented with customized main and sub-criteria for different study areas (Kamdar et al, 2019). The weights of the criteria of social impact (land transportation, protection area), environmental / technical (land use / cover, distance from water surfaces), and security (distance from airport) were calculated with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for solar park selection (Georgiou and Skarlatos, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%