2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3082198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Municipal Socialism or Municipal Capitalism? The Performance of Local Public Enterprises in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 For example, a significant fraction of SOEs operate in local 22 Backed with Matsa and Miller (2013) findings for Norway that firms affected by gender quotas undertake fewer workforce reductions, one may explain this finding by the lower willingness to shed labour in companies with a more gender-balanced governance. 23 See, e.g., Curci et al (2017) for the assessment of Italian local public enterprises' performance relative to the private sector firms. Notes: * denotes significance at 10%, ** significance at 5% and *** significance at 1%.…”
Section: Effects On Quality Of Public Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 For example, a significant fraction of SOEs operate in local 22 Backed with Matsa and Miller (2013) findings for Norway that firms affected by gender quotas undertake fewer workforce reductions, one may explain this finding by the lower willingness to shed labour in companies with a more gender-balanced governance. 23 See, e.g., Curci et al (2017) for the assessment of Italian local public enterprises' performance relative to the private sector firms. Notes: * denotes significance at 10%, ** significance at 5% and *** significance at 1%.…”
Section: Effects On Quality Of Public Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the presence of a more complex principal-agent chain (general public, public sector administrators, supervisory board and board of directors, CEO and professional management) can be cause of unclear lines of responsibility, lack of accountability and reduced democratic transparency (Osculati & Zatti, 2005;Klein, 2012;Saussier & Klein, 2014;Tõnurist & Karo, 2016;Curci et al, 2017;Bergh et al, 2019). Actually, in the case of a corporatized company there is (at least) a third party that intervenes between the principal and the agent (Osculati & Zatti, 2005;Bergh et al, 2019 23 ): the company board of directors and top management, often made up of members with a political background and/or directly appointed by the political shareholder.…”
Section: Potential and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, even evaluation criteria and indicators are usually those used for private enterprises. For example, Curci et al (2017) evaluate the performance of Italian local public enterprises in terms of operational efficiency (total factor productivity) and profitability (return on asset-ROA, equity-ROE and investments-ROI); Baum et al (2019) asses corruption effects on the performance of POEs considering as key performance indicators profitability (return on equity and operating profit per sales) and productivity and efficiency (sales per worker and labor costs). A similar approach can be found in Mocetti & Roma (2020) who evaluate the effect of the presence of politicians in the board of directors of POEs on their performance, measured through return on sales and the incidence of labor costs on sales.…”
Section: Box 1 Principles and Operative Recommendation For Corruption...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of birth of new POEs has been characterized in the last decades by a reverse U-shaped curve (Figure 2), with an increasing trend till the first years of the 20th century and a clear decline in the more recent period. As a result, a plethora of publicly-and semi-publicly-owned undertakings emerged, particularly at the regional and municipal level, active in several areas: services instrumental to the public administration, administrative functions, management of state assets, network industries or other services of general interest, but even provision of services on the open market 5 (Karantounias & Pinelli, 2016;Curci et al, 2017;Corte dei Conti, 2019;Mocetti & Roma, 2020). POEs are numerous and difficult to monitor, even due to the presence of complex and intricate ownership relationships.…”
Section: Poes In Italy: a General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%