Municipal Contracting With County Sheriffs for Police Services in California: Comparison of Cost and Effectiveness

Abstract

Rather than having a traditional, municipal police department nearly 30%of the 478 cities in California contract with their county sheriff for police services. The usual rationale is that contracting with the sheriff costs less than establishing and operating a city police department. This research investigates this issue by analyzing expenditure, crime, and other relevant data covering the 5-year period 2001-2005. It poses and answers the following questions: (1) Are the cities that contract (contract cities) similar to the cities that have their own police departments (department cities) on a range of characteristics that may affect the cost of policing? (2) Do statewide data show the claimed cost differential? (3) Are there differences in comparative costs between or within regions and counties in the state? and (4) Does contracting cost less because of less effective policing as measured by percentages of violent and property crimes cleared? Contract cities are newer, less populous, less dense, wealthier, have less business activity, have lower numbers and rates of reported crime, and have fewer arrests. It is suggested that there is less police work in the contract cities, and that may affect cost. Mean annual per capita police expenditures are much lower in the contract cities statewide, in both the northern and southern regions, and in three of the four southern California counties where contracting is most prevalent. Finally, contract cities have on average significantly higher clearance rates for violent crimes than department cities (especially in Los Angeles County) and the same clearance rates for property crimes. It does not appear that contract at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on May 16, 2015 pqx.sagepub.com Downloaded from Nelligan and Bourns 71 cities are paying less because they are getting lower quality police service, at least as measured by crime clearances. Suggestions are made for further research on the contracting phenomenon.

Defunding the police through shared service agreements: The impact on cost savings, staffing, and public safety using a bias‐corrected synthetic control analysis

“…Researchers from the Michigan Public Policy Survey reported 24% of local governments in the state contract police services from a neighboring city or the county (Mills & Ivacko, 2016). This is similar to California where it is estimated 30% of municipalities contract police services (Nelligan & Bourns, 2011). In other states, sharing services is far less common.…”

Race, Representation, and Revenue: Reliance on Fines and Forfeitures in City Governments

“…Contracting for primary government services, including law enforcement, is quite common in California municipalities. Contracting with the county sheriff’s department for law enforcement has historically been more common among smaller cities, newer cities, and in southern California (Nelligan and Bourns 2011). Kim (2015) found contracting in general to be higher among general law cities in California and the amount spent on contracting to vary more with the economy in mayor-council cities.…”

Police Performance As Symbolic Politics? Public Recognition and the Value of Awards

“…To answer the question proposed here, the following model assesses award finalists in state of California, which had 11 departments named as finalists for the IACP Community Policing Award between 2000-2006, more than any other state in the country. Public law enforcement agencies in California are frequently utilized to infer conclusions about public administration in the United States, including in the areas of interlocal service cooperation, municipal contracting, and community policing (Nelligan & Bourns, 2011;Roussell & Gascon, 2014;Zeemering, 2018). This is in part due to the public availability of data from the state, including crime rates, population served, demographic data, and other information on all police departments in the state.…”