Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09766-4_204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ey also require minimal performance tuning to extract performance on various GPU generations. ese new kernels represent critical building blocks for designing e cient sparse direct solvers on hardware accelerators [Amestoy et al 2011;Hénon et al 2002] as well as in the context of machine learning applications with low-rank matrix approximations [Akbudak et al 2017]. Future work includes extending these kernels to support non-uniform matrix sizes and a lightweight auto-tuning framework to optimize these batched operations transparently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ey also require minimal performance tuning to extract performance on various GPU generations. ese new kernels represent critical building blocks for designing e cient sparse direct solvers on hardware accelerators [Amestoy et al 2011;Hénon et al 2002] as well as in the context of machine learning applications with low-rank matrix approximations [Akbudak et al 2017]. Future work includes extending these kernels to support non-uniform matrix sizes and a lightweight auto-tuning framework to optimize these batched operations transparently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], a reordering strategy is proposed for the multifrontal solver Mumps [2]. The objective is to provide a row ordering and the associated mapping on a set of processors to minimize the total volume of communications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let's now define for each vertex the binary vector B i = (row ik ) k∈ 1, −1 . We can then define w i , the weight of a row i, as in (2), which represents the number of supernodes contributing to that row i, and the distance between two rows i and j, d i,j , as in (3). This is known as the Hamming distance [13] between two binary vectors and allows for measuring the number of off-diagonal blocks induced by the succession of two rows i and j.…”
Section: Problem Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%