2003
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-003-1664-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Statistical Model for 3D Image Segmentation with Application to Medical Images

Abstract: In this article we describe a statistical model that was developed to segment brain magnetic resonance images. The statistical segmentation algorithm was applied after a pre-processing stage involving the use of a 3D anisotropic filter along with histogram equalization techniques. The segmentation algorithm makes use of prior knowledge and a probabilitybased multivariate model designed to semi-automate the process of segmentation. The algorithm was applied to images obtained from the Center for Morphometric An… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have been conducted where different skull-stripping and brain segmentation algorithms are compared, both with each other, and with manual tracing, or realistic digital brain phantoms [Barra and Boire, 2001;Byrum et al, 1996;Cuadra et al, 2005;Fennema-Notestine et al, 2006;Good et al, 2002;Grabowski et al, 2000;Greenspan et al, 2006;Heckemann et al, 2006;John et al, 2003;Kovacevic et al, 2002;Lemieux et al, 2003;Moretti et al, 2000;Rehm et al, 2004;Toga and Thompson, 2003;Wang and Doddrell, 2002;Warfield et al, 2004;Zaidi et al, 2006;Bezdek et al, 1993]. Also, the impact of MR image acquisitions protocols on tissue segmentation results and brain volumes has been investigated [e.g., Lundervold et al, 2000;Clark et al, 2006], and one study specifically addressed reproducibility of volumetry results over time of Chard et al [2002].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted where different skull-stripping and brain segmentation algorithms are compared, both with each other, and with manual tracing, or realistic digital brain phantoms [Barra and Boire, 2001;Byrum et al, 1996;Cuadra et al, 2005;Fennema-Notestine et al, 2006;Good et al, 2002;Grabowski et al, 2000;Greenspan et al, 2006;Heckemann et al, 2006;John et al, 2003;Kovacevic et al, 2002;Lemieux et al, 2003;Moretti et al, 2000;Rehm et al, 2004;Toga and Thompson, 2003;Wang and Doddrell, 2002;Warfield et al, 2004;Zaidi et al, 2006;Bezdek et al, 1993]. Also, the impact of MR image acquisitions protocols on tissue segmentation results and brain volumes has been investigated [e.g., Lundervold et al, 2000;Clark et al, 2006], and one study specifically addressed reproducibility of volumetry results over time of Chard et al [2002].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D anisotropic filtering as described in [13], using kZ5 and for 10 iterations. Previously in [14], we showed how Global Intensity level correction could be applied to MRI sequences. Also in [14], we showed how sudden intensity variations that appear in many MR sequences could be accounted for.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously in [14], we showed how Global Intensity level correction could be applied to MRI sequences. Also in [14], we showed how sudden intensity variations that appear in many MR sequences could be accounted for. The same techniques were used here for preprocessing of imaged prior to segmentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the whole image sequence was completed, the combined peaks were clustered using the k-means clustering algorithm, which clusters objects by minimizing a squared error function (John et al, 2003) and a radius of 4-pixels. This step eliminated duplicate peaks and further refined peak location by averaging across multiple frames (Fig.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Converging Squares Algorithm To Astrocmentioning
confidence: 99%