1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00087.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Predictive Models for Group A Beta‐hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngitis in Children

Abstract: Abstract. Objectives:To create predictive models for the clinical diagnosis of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis in children. Methods: Patients aged 6 months to 18 years presenting to a pediatric ED with suspected GABHS pharyngitis were prospectively enrolled in the study. Clinicians recorded pertinent clinical information using a standardized form and obtained a throat swab to culture GABHS using a reference standard method. Twelve demographic and clinical features of patients with posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Attia et al also assessed the subjective diagnostic capacity of doctors and concluded that 52% of patients without the disease would be treated and 28% of sick patients would not be offered treatment. 9 In our study the physician would treat 47% of negative patients would fail to treat 21% of the positive patients, which values are very similar to those found by Attia et al (Figure 2). These analyses are reflected in the low sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values demonstrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Attia et al also assessed the subjective diagnostic capacity of doctors and concluded that 52% of patients without the disease would be treated and 28% of sick patients would not be offered treatment. 9 In our study the physician would treat 47% of negative patients would fail to treat 21% of the positive patients, which values are very similar to those found by Attia et al (Figure 2). These analyses are reflected in the low sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values demonstrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…If exanthema scarlatina is presented in its classic form it is highly indicative of bacterial disease, with a high positive predictive value, but it is, in fact, very rare. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] A recent meta-analysis, including several different studies and a total of 5,453 patients, took each symptom in isolation and was unable to identify any symptom that could alone diagnose streptococcal sore throat. 8 Even a combination of signs and symptoms was unable to differentiate with certainty between viral and bacterial sore throats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies abroad also indicated sore throat, tonsillar exudates, tender anterior cervical adenopathy and even high grade fever as the clinical predictors associated significantly with streptococcal pharyngitis. [28][29][30] Our study in Padang showed that tonsillar exudates and tender anterior cervical adenopathy were the strong clinical predictors and these were similar with other data from study abroad. 28,29 In our study, combination of more than two clinical predictors would increase probability of streptococcal pharyngitis (up to 99%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There are many clinical predictors of streptococcal pharyngitis proposed in studies and new important innovations in simplifying the diagnosis, especially in places with limited facility of laboratories. 17,[28][29][30] Only a little part of clinical features of acute pharyngitis were representative for clinical predictors of streptococcal pharyngitis. In Padang it was found only four clinical predictors are representative and those are sore throat, absence of cough, tonsillar exudates and tender anterior cervical adenopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, clinical findings and simple scoring systems based on these findings are unreliable for identifying patients with GAS pharyngitis (2,12,17,24,31). For this reason, laboratory tests are commonly used to confirm the diagnosis in children who present with throat pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%