2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate power-law models for streamflow prediction in the Mekong Basin

Abstract: Study region: Increasing demographic pressure and economic development in the Mekong Basin result in greater dependency on river water resources and increased vulnerability to streamflow variations. Study focus: Improved knowledge of flow variability is therefore paramount, especially in remote catchments, rarely gauged, and inhabited by vulnerable populations. We present simple multivariate power-law relationships for estimating streamflow metrics in ungauged areas, from easily obtained catchment characterist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the multiple discharge stations studied in the Lower Mekong, the Hurst coefficient for annual flow was greater than 0.5, suggesting that high flow will most likely be followed by another high flow in the future. Multiple works have presented various LMRB discharge statistics [ 14 , 32 ]. However, Table 1 adds new information—the coefficient of variation, skewness, and persistence and autocorrelation explained by the Hurst coefficient for the Lower Mekong River.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the multiple discharge stations studied in the Lower Mekong, the Hurst coefficient for annual flow was greater than 0.5, suggesting that high flow will most likely be followed by another high flow in the future. Multiple works have presented various LMRB discharge statistics [ 14 , 32 ]. However, Table 1 adds new information—the coefficient of variation, skewness, and persistence and autocorrelation explained by the Hurst coefficient for the Lower Mekong River.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As would be anticipated, the coefficients of the drainage density are consistently positive and negative for high and low flows, respectively. Flow percentiles of intermediate magnitude are not influenced by the drainage density (Lacombe et al 2014b).…”
Section: Physical Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches have been developed to forecast flooding on the Mekong River over the past 15 years. These have included different levels of deterministic modeling, such as nonlinear reservoir or tank type approaches to represent different components of the rainfallrunoff cycle; semi-distributed, grid based, macroscale models that represent the interaction between land cover, climate, and runoff generation; one, two, and three-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling; as well as more probabilistic-oriented modeling [16,[26][27][28][29][30]. Johnston and Kummu [31] provided a thorough review of historical modeling efforts for the Mekong River, with Johnston and Smakhtin [32] further noting "Repeated modeling using different algorithms with the same data has limited value.…”
Section: Fig 1 Physiographic Characteristics Of the Tonle Sap/mekonmentioning
confidence: 99%