2010
DOI: 10.1080/10543401003618108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Mann–Whitney Estimators for the Comparison of Two Treatments in a Three-Period Crossover Study with Randomly Missing Data

Abstract: This paper discusses the application of multivariate Mann-Whitney estimators to the comparison of two treatments for a strictly ordinal response variable in a crossover study with four sequence groups and three periods. Ways of managing randomly missing data and nonparametric covariance adjustment for no differences among groups for a baseline period have consideration as well. Estimators pertaining to treatment comparisons in linear logistic models for the Mann-Whitney estimators have determination through a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of HRV parameters between girls and boys was made with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. To address the issue of potential interaction between age and children's sex in the Man-Whitney test we controlled for the age factor by carrying out the stratified van Elteren's test, which is an extension of the Man-Whitney test (Kawaguchi and Koch, 2010, 2015). All children were divided into three age groups, i.e., 3–6 years old corresponding to early childhood (Group 1); 7–12 years old corresponding to preadolescence (Group 2); and 13–18 years old, i.e., adolescence (Group 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of HRV parameters between girls and boys was made with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. To address the issue of potential interaction between age and children's sex in the Man-Whitney test we controlled for the age factor by carrying out the stratified van Elteren's test, which is an extension of the Man-Whitney test (Kawaguchi and Koch, 2010, 2015). All children were divided into three age groups, i.e., 3–6 years old corresponding to early childhood (Group 1); 7–12 years old corresponding to preadolescence (Group 2); and 13–18 years old, i.e., adolescence (Group 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, simulation studies of Carr et al (1989) and Kawaguchi and Koch (2010) support somewhat better statistical properties for the use of this logit transformation than the actual Mann-Whitney estimator when the actual MannWhitney estimator is further from its null value of 0.5. Another strategy that can improve the statistical properties of the methods in this article for adjusted MannWhitney estimators is to multiply the applicable covariance matrices by (N − 1)/(N − q − r − M) and then to use t distributions with d.f.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…= (N − q − r − M) for confidence intervals and F distributions with d.f. = (c, N − q − r − M) for testing contrasts with rank c. Simulation studies concerning these modifications were discussed by Kawaguchi and Koch (2010) for a version of the methods in this article for a crossover study with four groups and no stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In crossover design, as one patient can receive more than one treatment during the trial, proper use of intra-subject comparison (for example, Wallenstein and Fisher, 1977;Hafner et al, 1988;Elswick and Uthoff, 1989;Putt and Chinchilli, 2004) reduces the bias due to different subjects and at the same time may give larger power than that obtained from inter-subject comparison (for example, Koch, 1972;Jung and Koch, 1999;Kawaguchi et al, 2009;Kawaguchi and Koch, 2010) while testing for the difference between treatment effects. On the other hand, intra-subject evaluation becomes impracticable in the presence of possible carryover effects especially for multiperiod crossover design accounting a large number of parameters.…”
Section: Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%