2018
DOI: 10.1002/env.2505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate left‐censored Bayesian modeling for predicting exposure using multiple chemical predictors

Abstract: Environmental health exposures to airborne chemicals often originate from chemical mixtures. Environmental health professionals may be interested in assessing exposure to one or more of the chemicals in these mixtures, but often exposure measurement data are not available, either because measurements were not collected/assessed for all exposure scenarios of interest or because some of the measurements were below the analytical methods’ limits of detection (i.e. censored). In some cases, based on chemical laws,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our design represents merely one possible way in which we might seek to model such data, and we shall pursue alternatives in future work. In situations where the emphasis lies firmly on prediction, for example, there is value in exploring a design similar to that of Groth et al (2018), in which each component of the multivariate response is regressed on the others. This in turn opens up new options for capturing and describing between‐depth relationships.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our design represents merely one possible way in which we might seek to model such data, and we shall pursue alternatives in future work. In situations where the emphasis lies firmly on prediction, for example, there is value in exploring a design similar to that of Groth et al (2018), in which each component of the multivariate response is regressed on the others. This in turn opens up new options for capturing and describing between‐depth relationships.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most priors were left vague to allow the data to drive the inference, we did restrict the GSDs in the repeated measures ANOVA in order to restrict possible GSDs to ranges typically seen in personal timeweighted averages. We also assume that measurements below the limit of detection follow similar trends as the observed measurements (52,53). Additional assumptions associated with ANOVA include normality of errors, independence of individuals (or observations within a non-repeated measures ANOVA), and constant variances within-and between-workers.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%