2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate genomic prediction for commercial traits of economic importance in Banana shrimp Fenneropenaeus merguiensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of the prediction accuracy for disease resistance traits, including survival rate and time to death, employing various statistical methods and algorithms, is shown in Table 4. Across our studied species, a consistent trend emerged indicating that multivariate analysis increased the precision of genomic prediction for disease-related traits [59,60]. The imputation of missing genotypes also contributed to an enhanced predictive capacity by 5-18% [41].…”
Section: Genomic Prediction To Enable Genome-based Selectionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A summary of the prediction accuracy for disease resistance traits, including survival rate and time to death, employing various statistical methods and algorithms, is shown in Table 4. Across our studied species, a consistent trend emerged indicating that multivariate analysis increased the precision of genomic prediction for disease-related traits [59,60]. The imputation of missing genotypes also contributed to an enhanced predictive capacity by 5-18% [41].…”
Section: Genomic Prediction To Enable Genome-based Selectionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…However, Bayes R marginally outperformed GBLUP and other Bayesian techniques. Both deep learning and machine learning approaches surpassed GBLUP and Bayes R to some extent; nevertheless, the advantages of AI algorithms are contingent upon the specific populations and traits under consideration [41,60]. Their benefits become more pronounced when modelling intricate interaction networks and variables (Nguyen et al, unpublished).…”
Section: Genomic Prediction To Enable Genome-based Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from these studies showed that the accuracies of genomic predictions were not improved for fillet weight and fillet yield in Nile tilapia O. niloticus ( Joshi et al, 2020 ) or for survival status and survival time in striped catfish P. hypophthalmus ( Vu et al, 2021 ), likely because the high heritability of these two traits and their high genetic correlations; hence, adding one trait did not improve the prediction accuracy of the other. In yellowtail kingfish, Nguyen et al (2022) also showed that the benefits of multi- vs. univariate analysis depend on statistical methods used and genomic architecture of traits. Hence, molecular dissection of the genomic architecture of traits (e.g., identifying pleotropic loci) can help further understand the impacts of multi-trait analysis on the prediction accuracy for tagging weight and disease resistance examined in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid search CV process allocated 80% of the training data to hyperparameter optimization, with the remaining data reserved for validation, achieved through the independent split function of ‘Keras’ [ 27 ]. Further insights into the hyperparameter optimization process and the libraries employed are available in prior publications [ 28 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%