2014
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate decoding of cerebral blood flow measures in a clinical model of on‐going postsurgical pain

Abstract: Recent reports of multivariate machine learning (ML) techniques have highlighted their potential use to detect prognostic and diagnostic markers of pain. However, applications to date have focussed on acute experimental nociceptive stimuli rather than clinically relevant pain states. These reports have coincided with others describing the application of arterial spin labeling (ASL) to detect changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in patients with on-going clinical pain. We combined these acquisition an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extraction of two or more impacted third molars requiring bone removal is considered a gold standard model for measuring the efficacy of new medications in moderate to severe acute pain [ 14 ]. Although tramadol has been demonstrated to be more effective than placebo in acute moderate to severe pain models in several clinical trials [ 15 , 16 ], it has not always been so [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of two or more impacted third molars requiring bone removal is considered a gold standard model for measuring the efficacy of new medications in moderate to severe acute pain [ 14 ]. Although tramadol has been demonstrated to be more effective than placebo in acute moderate to severe pain models in several clinical trials [ 15 , 16 ], it has not always been so [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data need to be split into ''training'' groups, used to obtain a provisional brain marker, and ''test'' groups, which evaluate predictive accuracy. Early ML studies in pain relied on single datasets (Brodersen et al, 2012;Marquand et al, 2010;O'Muircheartaigh et al, 2015), but more recent ones have drawn on multiple datasets that include a range of pain experiences both from healthy individuals (Wager et al, 2013) and those subjected to experimental models of pain (e.g., the capsaicin model of secondary hyperalgesia) and from patients (Duff et al, 2015). Robust regional networks modulated by analgesics can be identified using this approach from multiple studies and can be tested for utility as diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers.…”
Section: Machine-learning To Generate Biomarkers Of Pain Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hopefully, these technical problems can be easily addressed (e.g., in future experiments) or challenged by an understanding of the field and its limitations (as Davis et al so eloquently do - see First and Second Arguments in their paper). What is still unclear is why Segerdahl and colleagues, seem to have overlooked considerable prior work using ASL in experimental pain 6 - 8 , post-surgical pain 9 - 11 , and chronic pain 12 - 16 . There is also a noticeable lack of consideration for the limitations of both the imaging technique and the experimental pain model 5 , which itself in healthy volunteers, has some issues relating to reproducibility and its clinical relevance 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%