Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.06017
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Counterfactual Systems And Causal Graphical Models

Abstract: Among Judea Pearl's many contributions to Causality and Statistics, the graphical d-separation criterion, the do-calculus and the mediation formula stand out. In this chapter we show that d-separation provides direct insight into an earlier causal model originally described in terms of potential outcomes and event trees. In turn, the resulting synthesis leads to a simplification of the do-calculus that clarifies and separates the underlying concepts, and a simple counterfactual formulation of a complete identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently Propositions 45 and 46 and Theorem 65(c) inRichardson and Robins (2013) are incorrect. Correct reformulations are given below in Theorems 10, 11 and 12.10 This is as to be expected since d-separation encodes the global property that is implied by the local property.11 Note that in other papers(Shpitser et al, 2021;Malinsky et al, 2019;Richardson and Robins, 2013) d-connection for SWIGs is defined such that fixed nodes may never occur as non-endpoint vertices on d-connecting paths. In those papers we never formally condition on fixed nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently Propositions 45 and 46 and Theorem 65(c) inRichardson and Robins (2013) are incorrect. Correct reformulations are given below in Theorems 10, 11 and 12.10 This is as to be expected since d-separation encodes the global property that is implied by the local property.11 Note that in other papers(Shpitser et al, 2021;Malinsky et al, 2019;Richardson and Robins, 2013) d-connection for SWIGs is defined such that fixed nodes may never occur as non-endpoint vertices on d-connecting paths. In those papers we never formally condition on fixed nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…from fixed nodes a i that correspond to vertices A i that are not parents of V i in G given the parents of X i (a) in G(a), both random and fixed; see Shpitser et al (2021), Malinsky et al (2019), Robins (2018). Specifically we have:…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of rare disease and under the stronger constant effects assumption that š›½ = šœ† 1 š‘£š‘˜ ( Å«š‘˜ )āˆ•šœ† 0 š‘£š‘˜ ( Å«š‘˜ ) does not depend on š‘£, š‘˜, or Å«š‘˜ , it follows from (A.4) that we can expand the multiplicative bias as 4) holds under the assumption (which we assume is true) that the causal DAG in Figure 1 represents an underlying FFRCISTG counterfactual causal model (Robins, 1986) and thus also under Pearl's NPSEM with independent errors. See Richardson and Robins (2013) and Shpitser, Richardson, and Robins (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%