2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate assessment of soil quality indicators for crop rotation and tillage in Illinois

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Hickman (2002), studied nutrient availability under long-term rotations and tillage options in West Lafayette, IN, and found that unlike tillage, crop rotations had little effect on soil chemical parameters even though crop rotations with more corn had reduced pH, which might have been expected to affect nutrient availability. Similar results were found by Zuber et al (2015Zuber et al ( , 2017 when looking at rotations of CCC, CS, CSW (corn-soybean-wheat), and SSS in combination with tillage options following 14 yr of management at two Illinois sites. Though several soil attributes contributed to discriminate between the corn and soybean monocultures and, more strongly between tillage options, the rotations CCC and CS were not found to be different than the CSW rotation from a soil quality standpoint.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, Hickman (2002), studied nutrient availability under long-term rotations and tillage options in West Lafayette, IN, and found that unlike tillage, crop rotations had little effect on soil chemical parameters even though crop rotations with more corn had reduced pH, which might have been expected to affect nutrient availability. Similar results were found by Zuber et al (2015Zuber et al ( , 2017 when looking at rotations of CCC, CS, CSW (corn-soybean-wheat), and SSS in combination with tillage options following 14 yr of management at two Illinois sites. Though several soil attributes contributed to discriminate between the corn and soybean monocultures and, more strongly between tillage options, the rotations CCC and CS were not found to be different than the CSW rotation from a soil quality standpoint.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Lastly, three subsamples from the 1-2-mm soil fraction were used to determine the water aggregate stability (WAS) with an Eijkelkamp wet sieving apparatus (Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment, Giesbeek, The Netherlands), following Kemper and Rosenau [54]. The microbial biomasses of C (MBC, µg g −1 ) and N (MBN, µg g −1 ) were analyzed on a Shimadzu TOC-L and TNM-L analyzer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), following the modified chloroform fumigation extraction protocol for air-dried soils described in Zuber, et al [55]. Furthermore, soil macronutrients included soil ammonia intensity (NH 4 , mg-N kg −1 day −1 during the growing season), soil nitrate intensity (NO 3 , mg-N kg −1 day −1 during the growing season), and total soil nitrogen intensity (TIN, mg-N kg −1 day −1 during the growing season), which was determined by trapezoidal integration of soil concentration over time [8]-NH 4 and NO 3 separately and the sum of the two for TIN.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of variables (indicators) for inclusion in a SQI may be simplified by statistical methods. Several multivariate statistical techniques and modelling approaches have been widely applied to evaluate soil quality for different soils under different management regimes (Biswas et al 2017;Brejda et al 2000;de Paul Obade and Lal 2016;Nabiollahi et al 2018a,b;Nosrati 2013;Raiesi 2017;Sánchez-Navarro et al 2015;Yu et al 2018b;Zuber et al 2017). While the number and diversity of soil quality studies has increased, there remains a need to explore the scope for developing new SQIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%