Multivariate approach to classify research institutes according to their outputs: The case of the CSIC's institutes

Abstract

This paper attempts to build a classification model according to the research products created by those institutes and hence to design specific evaluation processes. Several scientific input/output indicators belonging to 109 research institutes from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) were selected. A multidimensional approach was proposed to resume these indicators in various components. A clustering analysis was used to classify the institutes according to their scores with those components (principal component analysis). Moreover, the validity of the a priori classification was tested and the most discriminant variables were detected (linear discriminant analysis). Results show that there are three types of institutes according to their research outputs:Humanistic, Scientific and Technological. It is argue that these differences oblige to design more precise assessment exercises which focus on the particular results of each type of institute. We conclude that this method permits to build more precise research assessment exercises which consider the varied nature of the scientific activity.

Trends and Biases in Global Climate Change Literature

“…This temporal change of keywords has also been showed in others scientometric studies (Carneiro et al 2008;Nobis & Wohlgemuth 2004), revealing the dynamics of scientific researches (e.g. Ortega et al 2011;Carneiro et al 2008).…”

Research-driven classification and ranking in higher education: an empirical appraisal of a Romanian policy experience

“…The empirically-driven approach, however, is followed by both the historically well-established Carnegie Classification of US educational organizations as well as by the more recent U-Map effort of classifying European universities. Recent work by Shin (2009), Ortega et al (2011 and García et al (2012) have also mainly focused on the empirical construction of classifications through the use of cluster analysis.…”

Quality of research: which underlying values?

“…The quest to find new, more efficient indicators is always present (see for example the corrected h-index for Brazilian, Portuguese and Spanish universities' performance estimation, Vieira and Gomes 2010) with the aim to build more precise research assessment exercises which consider the diversity of scientific activity (e.g. : Spain, Ortega et al 2011). To complete existing statistical indicators some institutions, such as the Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST) 4 in France, produce indicators for each stakeholder of a research (e.g., a country, a region, an institution) in order to characterize its scientific activity, to compare it to the activity of its partners or competitors, to follow its evolution over time.…”