1987
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520230051013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Analysis of Improvement and Outcome Following Stroke Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
96
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…48,49 The role that the nonlesional hemisphere plays remains controversial. In the short term, ipsilateral primary motor cortex has been shown to compensate for an acute loss of the opposite sided primary motor cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49 The role that the nonlesional hemisphere plays remains controversial. In the short term, ipsilateral primary motor cortex has been shown to compensate for an acute loss of the opposite sided primary motor cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The Barthel Index measures functional independence at one point in time, and the change in Barthel Index score from rehabilitation commencement to discharge can be calculated as one measure of functional improvement. Rehabilitation efficiency 15 is the amount of improvement divided by the duration of rehabilitation stay and can be regarded as the average increase in Barthel Index score per day: rehabilitation efficiency=(discharge Barthel Index score-initial Barthel Index score)-^duration of rehabilitation stay. Since the potential improvement for patients with high initial scores is lower than that for those with low initial scores, another way to measure functional improvement is achievement of potential improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meta-analysis study by Ottenbacher et al, the median interrater reliability coefficient for the total FIM was 0.95, the median test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.95, and the equivalence reliability coefficient was 0.92 [32]. Multiple studies have demonstrated validity of the FIM [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The FONE FIM (telephone version of the FIM) was used in each current study to collect data on functional status from the veteran at 3 months postdischarge.…”
Section: Veteran Functional Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%