1970
DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0503_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Analysis of Gang Delinquency: Ii. Structural and Dynamic Properties of Gangs

Abstract: Measures of structural and dynamic properties of gangs are developed: size, differentiation, primary pattern strength, competing pattern strength, and territorial dispersion; and cohesiveness, uniformity of attitude, and felt effectiveness. Except for size and dispersion, all measures are derived from applications of cluster and factor analysis. Evidence of construct validity is provided. The measurements are then related to mean scores on five factors of behavior for sixteen gangs. It is found that less diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both interpretations resonated with a growing sense that street worker programs were ineffective, perhaps even counterproductive (Carney, Mattick, and Callaway, ; Miller, ). Although subsequent analyses of Short and Strodbeck's () data revealed an inverse association between offending behaviors and self‐reported attraction to and identification with the gang (Cartwright, Howard, and Reuterman, ), these findings did little to slow movement away from detached worker intervention programs. Later, as others weighed in to suggest that gangs resort to violence to increase waning cohesion (Decker and Van Winkle, ; Jankowski, ; but see Morash, ), Short () sought to reconcile discrepant findings by pointing to differences in the histories of cohesiveness among studied gangs and in the attitudes of and actions taken by detached workers (e.g., pro‐ vs. anti‐police and active group programming vs. hanging and intervening with individual boys).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both interpretations resonated with a growing sense that street worker programs were ineffective, perhaps even counterproductive (Carney, Mattick, and Callaway, ; Miller, ). Although subsequent analyses of Short and Strodbeck's () data revealed an inverse association between offending behaviors and self‐reported attraction to and identification with the gang (Cartwright, Howard, and Reuterman, ), these findings did little to slow movement away from detached worker intervention programs. Later, as others weighed in to suggest that gangs resort to violence to increase waning cohesion (Decker and Van Winkle, ; Jankowski, ; but see Morash, ), Short () sought to reconcile discrepant findings by pointing to differences in the histories of cohesiveness among studied gangs and in the attitudes of and actions taken by detached workers (e.g., pro‐ vs. anti‐police and active group programming vs. hanging and intervening with individual boys).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although average degree is similar to the measure of density used in previous research (e.g., Haynie, ; see also Kreager, Rulison, and Moody, ), it differs from both Klein's (, ) and Jansyn's () measure of cohesiveness in that it emphasizes friendships rather than frequency of contact. Despite evidence that gang cohesion is “less a function of internal factors such as affective ties or individual similarities than external factors that spawn social interaction in reaction to gang rivalries” (Hennigan and Spanovic, : 143), interpersonal relations feature prominently in small‐groups research, including studies of adolescent peer groups, and thus seem to be crucial for gang researchers to consider (see, e.g., Allen et al, ; Haynie, ; Kreager, Rulison, and Moody, ; see also Cartwright, Howard, and Reuterman, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested in an earlier paper in the series (Cartwright et al, 1970) a group or gang may be characterized partly in terms of its personnel. For example the average age of a gang is a significant piece of information about the gang as a whole.…”
Section: Persomlity M Personnel Chractaristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Personnel characteristics may also be related to other group properties (Cartwright et al, 1970). Relevant results are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Persomlity M Personnel Chractaristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tryon and Bailey, 1965, 1967. Tryon and Bailey (1970, Chapter 13) Howard, and Reuterman (1970) studied structural properties (differentiation, etc.) of small groups using behavior profiles and intraclass correlation coefficients between members.…”
Section: Integrative Features Of the Bc Trymentioning
confidence: 99%