2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of brain metastases in localised non-small cell lung carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
83
5
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
83
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Bajard et al showed that clinical T classification was significant for development of brain metastases in a cohort of 305 NSCLC patients (168 with stage I-II disease). 36 Similarly, in a study of 264 NSCLC patients at all stages (31% with stage I-II disease), Mujumoor and colleagues showed that the probability of developing metastases to the brain was significantly increased with increasing clinical tumor size. 38 In contrast, other studies have shown that for resected stage IIIA patients, pathologic T classification was not significantly associated with incidence of brain metasteses.…”
Section: Clinical and Pathologic Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Bajard et al showed that clinical T classification was significant for development of brain metastases in a cohort of 305 NSCLC patients (168 with stage I-II disease). 36 Similarly, in a study of 264 NSCLC patients at all stages (31% with stage I-II disease), Mujumoor and colleagues showed that the probability of developing metastases to the brain was significantly increased with increasing clinical tumor size. 38 In contrast, other studies have shown that for resected stage IIIA patients, pathologic T classification was not significantly associated with incidence of brain metasteses.…”
Section: Clinical and Pathologic Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…45 Histology was not a statistically significant factor in our series (P ¼ .14). Nonsquamous histology, adenocarcinoma in particular, has been associated with an increased risk of developing brain metastases in some, 33,34,38,39,46 but not all, [35][36][37] studies.…”
Section: Original Article 5042mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference may be due to a more aggressive cancer in younger patients [5,57]. The odds ratio for brain metastasis associated with a young age (<50 or 60 years old, depending upon the study) compared to older age ranged from 1.26 (95% CI: 1.03-1.53) to 2.5(95%CI: 1.33-4.76) [189][190][191]. When older age was the reference in comparison to younger age, it had a protective effect that ranged from 0.5 (95%CI: 0.4-0.7) to 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97-0.99) [9,185,187,192,195].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although knowledge regarding modifiable risk factors is scarce, several nonmodifiable risk factors are known to influence the cumulative incidence of brain metastasis. Brain metastasis are more common in younger cancer patients than older cancer patients in breast cancer and melanoma [8,9,153,185,[187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194]. The risk of brain metastasis appears to increase until 40 to 49 years of age and then decline thereafter [131].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation