2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.odw.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of factors affecting dental arch relationships in Japanese unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at Hokkaido University Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Malaysia, cleft lip and palate is the second most birth anomalies in children with cleft lip and palate has led to great diversity in protocols and surgical techniques by various cleft groups worldwide [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malaysia, cleft lip and palate is the second most birth anomalies in children with cleft lip and palate has led to great diversity in protocols and surgical techniques by various cleft groups worldwide [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthodontic anomalies such as crowding, rotation and malposition of the teeth are also common in cleft lip and palate patients 8,9) . Major problems in patients with cleft lip and palate is maxillary growth retardation and high incidence of Class III malocclusion 10,11) . Maxillary growth retardation is caused by postnatal treatment factors (cheiloplasty or palatoplasty) and/or congenital factors (type of UCLP, side, family history of cleft and class III malocclusion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be considered a point of strength that distinguishes the present study from other studies, such as Sandy et al in 1998 [38], Alam et al in 2008 [39], and Fudalej P et al in 2009 [22]. The mentioned studies [22,[37][38][39], used the Five-Year-Old and Great Ormond Street, London and Oslo (Goslon) indices of dental arch deformity in examining early surgical outcomes in UCLP children. However, neither of these qualitative indices compares dental arch relationship with non-cleft data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It affects about 1.5 per 1000 live births worldwide 4) . Children with CLP do not represent a homogenous population, and the signs and symptoms associated with clefting depend on a variety of factors 5,6,7,8 . Common issues that children with a history of cleft palate (CP) can encounter include problems related to feeding, dental and occlusal deviations, hearing and middle ear function, psychosocial development and in speech sound acquisition and language development 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%