1966
DOI: 10.2307/1169484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, multivariate tests were examined. If a significant multivariate effect was observed, univariate tests that were significant or approached significance (p = .10) (Cramer & Bock, 1966) were then cients were considered too low. The specific scale used was a modified version of the social contact scale developed by Klineberg and Hull (1979) and was adapted to fit the corporate context.…”
Section: Questionnaire Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, multivariate tests were examined. If a significant multivariate effect was observed, univariate tests that were significant or approached significance (p = .10) (Cramer & Bock, 1966) were then cients were considered too low. The specific scale used was a modified version of the social contact scale developed by Klineberg and Hull (1979) and was adapted to fit the corporate context.…”
Section: Questionnaire Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wilks' Lambda Statistic has been used because it is the most appropriate when there are more than three treatments (Hair et al, 1979). Once the significant treatment effects were identified, post hoc tests of the p univariate ANOVA models were executed in order to find the significance of specific treatments on each extracted factor (Cramer & Bock, 1966cited in Hair et al, 1979. That is, for each extracted factor the Fixed Effects Multifactor Analysis of Variance (Model Type I) was carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To protect against inflation of type 1 error rate, differences between the mTBI and HCs on the means of 19 neuropsychological dependent variables were evaluated using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), followed by a series of univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) to establish which tests accounted for any significant effect found with the MANCOVA. 47 Whereas data were collected for 22 different neuropsychological dependent variables, owing to 5 participants not completing the BVMT-R and D-KEFS Sorting subtests, and the high collinearity between the CVLT long-delay free recall variable of the CVLT-II with the other two CVLT-II variables, four variables were removed from the MANCOVA analysis. Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matrices was used to make sure that the covariance matrices of the dependent variables between the two groups were equal.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Neuropsychological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%