2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariable G-E interplay in the prediction of educational achievement

Abstract: Polygenic scores are increasingly powerful predictors of educational achievement. It is unclear, however, how sets of polygenic scores, which partly capture environmental effects, perform jointly with sets of environmental measures, which are themselves heritable, in prediction models of educational achievement. Here, for the first time, we systematically investigate gene-environment correlation (rGE) and interaction (GxE) in the joint analysis of multiple genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS) and multiple enviro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings contribute to a growing body of literature that struggles to identify GxE effects (27-30), because of three key challenges. First, studies that examine only one or two environmental moderators are likely to identify false positives, because of residual confounding that is unaccounted for (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings contribute to a growing body of literature that struggles to identify GxE effects (27-30), because of three key challenges. First, studies that examine only one or two environmental moderators are likely to identify false positives, because of residual confounding that is unaccounted for (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We partly overcome this challenge in the current research by comprehensively assessing the environment and testing 30 environmental moderators simultaneously. Second, testing GxE effects requires extremely large samples that afford sufficient statistical power to detect associations of very small effect size, which are likely to be true for GxE terms (25, 27). In the current study, we analyzed data from more than 3,000 individuals, which compares well with other GxE studies on alcohol use but is small relative to the populations that are typically assessed in GWA studies (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an extensive, conclusive body of empirical evidence has shown that correlations between genetic factors and environments are commonplace, G×Es remain to be reliably demonstrated (Duncan & Keller, 2011;Manuck & McCaffery, 2014;Tucker-Drob & Bates, 2016). For example, a recent large-scale study that tested GrEs and G×Es across multiple genotypes, phenotypes, and environments in the prediction of educational achievement observed systematic GrEs but concluded that the contributions of G×Es were random, weak, and negligible (Allegrini et al, 2020). Compared with detecting direct effects of genotypes on phenotypes (i.e., GrE), identifying G×Es is statistically more demanding because to be adequately powered, interaction models require much larger sample sizes than tests of direct effects (Duncan & Keller, 2011;Moffitt et al, 2006).…”
Section: Genes In Their Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methods for obtaining DNA, genotyping, quality control and constructing polygenic scores have been described previously (Rimfeld et al, 2019; Selzam et al, 2018). In the present analyses, we included 15 genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS) of behaviour problems and psychopathology, derived from the most powerful genome-wide association (GWA) studies, which were used in our previous research (Allegrini et al, 2019; Allegrini et al, 2020a). For the list of polygenic scores, please refer to Supporting information 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the joint prediction of the 15 GPS (multi-GPS heritability) in a penalized regression elastic net model with out-of-sample evaluation of prediction accuracy. For details on the elastic net regularization analytic procedure, please refer to Supporting information 9 and Allegrini et al (2020a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%