“…Similar constellations were previously reported in individual patients with photoconvulsive reaction who had partial epilepsy and occipital epileptic focus 3. Cortical and subcortical recordings in monkeys during IPS showed paroxysmal discharges predominantly in prerolandic areas, which were followed by bursts in the pontine and mesencephalic reticular formation and, finally, by generalised discharges 4. These findings have been interpreted in favour of a cortical origin of the photoconvulsive reaction, which is supported by the studies of Ricci et al
5 using neuromagnetic methods in humans with photoconvulsive reaction to identify the location of the photoconvulsive reaction generator: They found a regional sensitivity involving frontal, occipital, and temporal areas, but the cortical excitability was extremely unstable, which was attributed to a deficient GABA-ergic system.…”
“…Similar constellations were previously reported in individual patients with photoconvulsive reaction who had partial epilepsy and occipital epileptic focus 3. Cortical and subcortical recordings in monkeys during IPS showed paroxysmal discharges predominantly in prerolandic areas, which were followed by bursts in the pontine and mesencephalic reticular formation and, finally, by generalised discharges 4. These findings have been interpreted in favour of a cortical origin of the photoconvulsive reaction, which is supported by the studies of Ricci et al
5 using neuromagnetic methods in humans with photoconvulsive reaction to identify the location of the photoconvulsive reaction generator: They found a regional sensitivity involving frontal, occipital, and temporal areas, but the cortical excitability was extremely unstable, which was attributed to a deficient GABA-ergic system.…”
“…Another explanation is that the more extensive inter-hemispheric synaptic connections between extra-temporal lobe regions facilitate the spread or propagation of epileptic activity between these hemispheres when the focus is in these regions. This is supported by evidence from EEG-fMRI studies (Yu et al, 2009;Kobayashi et al, 2006) (Tyvaert et al, 2008) as well as human and animal data (Keller and Roberts, 2008;Blumenfeld et al, 2007); (Holmes et al, 1999;Zilles et al, 1998;Silva-Barrat et al, 1986) which show regional as well as distant cortical and subcortical changes associated with focal interictal spikes, being more so in patients with extra-temporal foci. It also would correlate well with the described increased incidence of bilateral features in extra-temporal lobe seizure semiologies (Luders et al, 1998;Gastaut, 1970) and of bilateral interictal and ictal discharges seen in patients with extra-TLE (Bautista et al, 1998;Taylor et al, 2003;Gibbs and Gibbs, 1955) as opposed to TLE where most reports show that even if bilateral interictal discharges are recorded, they are predominant over the side with seizure onset in 60-70% of patients (Hirsch et al, 1991;Williamson et al, 1993).…”
“…These regions were not included in our model because they did not demonstrate significant CBF changes during the PPR in earlier conditional contrast and covariance studies (Szabó et al 2007; Szabó et al 2011). The thalamus is another structure extensively connected with the frontoparietal cortices, which is typically activated in the setting of prolonged generalized spike-and-wave discharges or absence seizures in humans (Bai et al 2010; Benuzzi et al 2012), and in the setting of sustained repetitive IEDs in the epileptic baboon (Fischer-Williams et al 1968; Szabó et al 2008; Silva-Barrat et al 1986). However, as most of the PPRs were brief and PCRs were restricted to brief myoclonic seizures in the PS baboons, it not surprising that the thalamus was not involved or significantly activated.…”
The baboon provides a model of photosensitive, generalized epilepsy. This study compares cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses during intermittent light stimulation (ILS) between photosensitive (PS) and healthy control (CTL) baboons using H215O-PET. We examined effective connectivity associated with visual stimulation in both groups using structural equation modeling (SEM). Eight PS and six CTL baboons, matched for age, gender and weight, were classified on the basis of scalp EEG findings performed during the neuroimaging studies. Five H215O-PET studies were acquired alternating between resting and activation (ILS at 25 Hz) scans. PET images were acquired in 3D mode and co-registered with MRI. SEM demonstrated differences in neural connectivity between PS and CTL groups during ILS that were not previously identified using traditional activation analyses. First-level pathways consisted of similar posterior-to-anterior projections in both groups. While second-level pathways were mainly lateralized to the left hemisphere in the CTL group, they consisted of bilateral anterior-to-posterior projections in the PS baboons. Third- and fourth-level pathways were only evident in PS baboons. This is the first functional neuroimaging study using to model the photoparoxysmal response (PPR) using a primate model of photosensitive, generalized epilepsy. Evidence of increased interhemispheric connectivity and bidirectional feedback loops in the PS baboons represents electrophysiological synchronization associated with the generation of epileptic discharges. PS baboons demonstrated decreased model stability compared to controls, which may be attributed to greater variability in the driving response or PPRs, or to the influence of regions not included in the model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.