1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.01051.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multitype Spatial Point Patterns with Hierarchical Interactions

Abstract: Multitype spatial point patterns with hierarchical interactions are considered. Here hierarchical interaction means directionality: points on a higher level of hierarchy affect the locations of points on the lower levels, but not vice versa. Such relations are common, for example, in ecological communities. Interacting point patterns are often modeled by Gibbs processes with pairwise interactions. However, these models are inherently symmetric, and the hierarchy can be acknowledged only when interpreting the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming known interaction radii, Högmander and Särkkä (1999) consider a hierarchical model with interactions for a bivariate point pattern of ants' nests. However, in our situation, we believe that the assumption of known and equal interaction radii for resprouters of the same type is highly unrealistic, since the plants vary in size, and we choose to focus on this problem in the next section.…”
Section: Assumptions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming known interaction radii, Högmander and Särkkä (1999) consider a hierarchical model with interactions for a bivariate point pattern of ants' nests. However, in our situation, we believe that the assumption of known and equal interaction radii for resprouters of the same type is highly unrealistic, since the plants vary in size, and we choose to focus on this problem in the next section.…”
Section: Assumptions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full dataset records the locations of nests of two species of ants, observed in an irregular convex polygonal boundary, together with annotations showing a foot track through the region, and the boundary between field and scrub areas inside the region. Rectangular subsets of the data (marked "A" and "B" on the Figure) were analysed in Harkness and Isham (1983); Isham (1984); Takacs and Fiksel (1986); Högmander and Särkkä (1999); Baddeley and Turner (2000) and (Särkkä 1993, section 5.3). Again, as far as we are aware, the full dataset has never been subjected to detailed analysis inside the correct window.…”
Section: Region IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address such questions a suitable modelling framework is needed. The literature on multivariate spatial point process models is mainly restricted to the bivariate case; see for example Diggle and Milne (), Harkness and Isham (), Högmander and Särkkä (), Brix and Møller (), Allard et al . (), Diggle (), Picard et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%