2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3117276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multitask Deep Learning Reconstruction and Localization of Lesions in Limited Angle Diffuse Optical Tomography

Abstract: Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) leverages near-infrared light propagation through tissue to assess its optical properties and identify abnormalities. DOT image reconstruction is an ill-posed problem due to the highly scattered photons in the medium and the smaller number of measurements compared to the number of unknowns. Limited-angle DOT reduces probe complexity at the cost of increased reconstruction complexity. Reconstructions are thus commonly marred by artifacts and, as a result, it is difficult to obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared NeuDOT to two state-of-the-art DOT reconstruction methods: 1) a physics-based method with modified Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LM) [13] and 2) a recently proposed CNN-based supervised learning method [14]. In Experiment 1, we assessed NeuDOT's reconstruction performance in the lateral direction using a scattering phantom with two-dimensional planar patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared NeuDOT to two state-of-the-art DOT reconstruction methods: 1) a physics-based method with modified Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LM) [13] and 2) a recently proposed CNN-based supervised learning method [14]. In Experiment 1, we assessed NeuDOT's reconstruction performance in the lateral direction using a scattering phantom with two-dimensional planar patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the regularization parameters need to be adjusted empirically, leading to artificial subjectivity and non-robustness of the reconstruction results. In recent years, deep learning technology has been applied to the field of 3D OI and exhibits great potential (Gao et al 2018, Li et al 2020, Meng et al 2020, Zhang et al 2021b, Mozumder et al 2022, Yedder et al 2022, Li et al 2023, such as the inverse problem simulation (IPS) (Gao et al 2018), graph convolution networks (GNN) (Li et al 2020), 3D fusion dual-sampling deep neural networks (Li et al 2023), etc. Such datadriven based deep learning methods which have been obtained spread applications in the field of photonics (Li et al 2021, Yun et al 2022, Zhao et al 2022 could learn the relationship between the surface light distribution and internal targets directly from a training dataset, which has the advantage of being fast compared to iterative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] Applications of ML in optical fields ranging from biotechnology 9 to cancer diagnosis 10 have shown great potential for localization, classifying, and segmentation of tumors for diverse samples in biomedical applications. [11][12][13] Despite the excellent performance of convolution neural network (CNN)-based deep learning reconstruction methods, the locality of the convolution operator makes it difficult to learn global and long-range image information, i.e., reconstructing absorption and scattering coefficient in the same network well. 14 Previously, numerous data-driven algorithms for sources and detectors have been used to reconstruct DOI optical-property images by generating simulation datasets for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%