Multisystemic Therapy for Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems in Youth Aged 10–17

Abstract

The aim of this Campbell Systematic Review was to evaluate the effect of multi‐systemic therapy (MST) on adolescents with social, emotional, and behavioural problems based on the best available evidence. The effect is measured by a range of behavioural and psychosocial outcomes, including the number of institutional placements and arrests, the incidence of drug abuse, and personal relationships, social skills, absence from school, etc. The review is exclusively based on randomised controlled trials in which random allocation between MST and usual treatment has taken place. 266 reports were selected on the basis of title and abstract. Of these 35 were found actually to be effect studies. And finally, eight of the 35 effect studies met the pre‐set quality criteria laid down in the original Campbell/Cochrane review. The Campbell/Cochrane review concludes that MST does not have consistently better effects than other types of interventions ‐ for example, restrictive institutional placement. On the other hand, nothing indicates that MST has any negative overall effects. All in all, MST does not seem to be any better or any poorer than other treatments. The Campbell/Cochrane review concludes that there are no consistent differences in outcome between the adolescents subject to MST and those subject to alternative treatment. This conclusion is based on the best available evidence on the effectiveness of MST. Synopsis Results of eight randomised controlled trials of Multisystemic Therapy (MST) conducted in the USA, Canada, and Norway indicate that it is premature to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of MST compared with other services. Results are inconsistent across studies that vary in quality and context. There is no information about the effects of MST compared with no treatment. There is no evidence that MST has harmful effects. Abstract BackgroundMultisystemic Therapy (MST) is an intensive, home‐based intervention for families of youth with social, emotional, and behavioral problems. Masters‐level therapists engage family members in identifying and changing individual, family, and environmental factors thought to contribute to problem behavior. Intervention may include efforts to improve communication, parenting skills, peer relations, school performance, and social networks. Most MST trials were conducted by program developers in the USA; results of one independent trial are available and others are in progress. ObjectivesTo provide unbiased estimates of the impacts of MST on restrictive out‐of‐home living arrangements, crime and delinquency, and other behavioral and psychosocial outcomes for youth and families. Search strategyElectronic searches were made of bibliographic databases (including the Cochrane Library, C2‐SPECTR, PsycINFO, Science Direct and Sociological Abstracts) as well as government and professional websites, from 1985 to January 2003. Reference lists of articles were examined, and experts were contacted. Selection criteriaStudies where youth (age 10–17) with social, emotional, and/or behavi...

Implementing randomized experiments in criminal justice settings: An evaluation of multi-systemic therapy in the Netherlands

“…Also, with a few exceptions (Leschied and Cunningham 2002;Ogden and Halliday-Boykins 2004;Timmons-Mitchell et al 2006), most of the empirical support, including the meta-analysis by Curtis et al (2004), comes from the studies conducted by the same group of researchers who also developed and implemented MST. A meta-analysis conducted by Littell et al (2005) showed much less promising results. There is a clear need for confirmation of these results by an independent group of researchers.…”

Los Angeles County Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act: Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Report

“…We would note that a meta-analysis of MST studies has indicated that the program's benefit is modest or nonsignificant when one excludes the demonstration programs developed and evaluated by Henggeler and his colleagues (Littell, Popa, and Forsythe, 2005).…”

Stigmatization and self-perception of youth with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

“…17 Of the psychosocial treatments, behavioral parent training, behavioral classroom management, and peer-focused behavior interventions in recreational settings (like summer camps) have well-established efficacy; however, the latter are frequently unavailable in usual community settings. 15 Other types of psychotherapy, alone and in combination with medications, may be indicated for patients with ADHD and comorbid disorders, eg, habit-reversal training for tic disorders, 18 multisystemic family therapy for disruptive behavior disorders, 19 or cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorders. 20 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions, including dietary, behavioral, cognitive, and neurofeedback modalities, found small but significant symptom reductions produced by free fatty acid supplementation, but cautioned that better evidence from blinded assessment is needed before nonpharmacological interventions can be supported as treatments for core ADHD symptoms.…”

“…Other types of psychotherapy, alone and in combination with medications, may be indicated for patients with ADHD and comorbid disorders, eg, habit-reversal training for tic disorders, 18 multisystemic family therapy for disruptive behavior disorders, 19 or cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorders.…”