2009
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multistate study of the epidemiology of clubfoot

Abstract: We estimated the prevalence of clubfoot using data from several birth defects programs, representing one-quarter of all births in the United States. Our findings underline the importance of birth defects surveillance programs and their utility in monitoring population-based prevalence and investigating risk factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
8
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
68
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the professional background, age of the parents/caregivers and relationship to the child with clubfoot does not affect the treatment seeking behaviour for their children. This is contrary to a study conducted in the United States by Parker et al (2009), the authors found that maternal age, parity, education, and marital status were significantly associated with clubfoot.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the professional background, age of the parents/caregivers and relationship to the child with clubfoot does not affect the treatment seeking behaviour for their children. This is contrary to a study conducted in the United States by Parker et al (2009), the authors found that maternal age, parity, education, and marital status were significantly associated with clubfoot.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a study by Baker et al (2003) estimated the prevalence of clubfoot to be 2.57 per 1000 live births in the United States. Likewise, Parker et al (2009) indicated that the prevalence of clubfoot among african american was 1.14 per 1000 live births.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Clubfootmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (74%) of the CHOP cohort is Caucasian and since the prevalence of club foot within the general Caucasian population is ~1:1,000 patients, the prevalence of club foot occurs approximately 30 times more often within 22q11.2DS as compared to the general Caucasian population. Moreover, the bilateral:unilateral and male:female ratio are comparable with the general population (Krogsgaard et al, 2006; Parker et al, 2009; Stone et al, 2017; Werler et al, 2013). Last, we did not find a relation between the presence of club foot and the presence of a CHD and/or a cleft palate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The prevalence of congenital isolated club foot in the general population differs among multiple ethnic populations, but is approximately 1.2–6 per 1,000 individuals. Within the group of patients with isolated club foot the male:female ratio is 2:1 and half of the patients have a bilateral club foot (Cartlidge, 1983; Krogsgaard et al, 2006; Parker et al, 2009; Stone, Martis, & Crawford, 2017; Werler et al, 2013). In studies on club foot within 22q11.2DS the prevalence ranges from 1.1 to 13.3%, which seems to be higher as compared to the general population (Homans et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This however varies between races, ethnicities and countries. In the USA, a study reported 1.29 /1000 births, while in Africa, some studies like in Malawi reported 2/1000 births and in Nigerian, reported 3.4/1000 births (Parker et al, 2009;Mkandawire and Kaunda, 2004;Ukoha et al, 2011). There is usually an underestimation of the true incidence due to under-reporting and missing cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%