2023
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2022165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multispike Solutions for a slightly subcritical elliptic problem with non-power nonlinearity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ε > 0. As mentioned in [7] and [5], there is an interesting analogy between results obtained for (Pε) and those known for the usual elliptic equation (1.9). In this direction, we prove here that (Pε) shares also with problem (1.9), the existence of tower bubbles solutions of different blow-up orders, as conjectured in [7].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where ε > 0. As mentioned in [7] and [5], there is an interesting analogy between results obtained for (Pε) and those known for the usual elliptic equation (1.9). In this direction, we prove here that (Pε) shares also with problem (1.9), the existence of tower bubbles solutions of different blow-up orders, as conjectured in [7].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The nonlinearity fε where ε > 0 has been studied in several works (see for instance [5], [7], [12], [13], [17]). The existence of solutions for (Pε) when ε > 0 is guaranteed by a variational argument developed in [12].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the following integral is needed in the proof of Proposition 2.2 and it was computed in [5]. We have…”
Section: The Technical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one concerns the nonlinearity fε and its derivatives. It is contained in [7] and [5]. (1 + r 2 ) (n+2)/2 ≤ cλ (n−2)/2 ≤ cδ (a,λ) (y).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%