2013
DOI: 10.1148/rg.335125212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multispectral Quantitative MR Imaging of the Human Brain: Lifetime Age-related Effects

Abstract: Quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows visualization of age-related changes in the normal human brain from functional, biochemical, and morphologic perspectives. Findings at quantitative MR imaging support age-related microstructural changes in the brain: (a) volume expansion, increased myelination, and axonal growth, which establish neural connectivity in neurodevelopment, followed by (b) volume loss, myelin breakdown, and axonal degradation, leading to the disruption of neural integrity later in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content of water in brain decreases with age. In other words, ADC values will decrease with age, which continues until the infant is about 2 years old [14,15]. In the present study, ADC values of the BG, THAL, cerebellum and OWM declined with the increase of GA, which is similar to results of previous studies [16,17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The content of water in brain decreases with age. In other words, ADC values will decrease with age, which continues until the infant is about 2 years old [14,15]. In the present study, ADC values of the BG, THAL, cerebellum and OWM declined with the increase of GA, which is similar to results of previous studies [16,17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(Laule et al, 2006(Laule et al, , 2008. However, there is still inconsistency between studies in terms of the nature of the myelin-age relationships, where some studies also report a linear decline with age for these quantitative metrics (Callaghan et al, 2014;Cherubini et al, 2009), while other studies have observed quadratic associations between age and myelin, with peak myelin varying between 30 and 50 years of age (Arshad et al, 2016;Ge et al, 2002;Inglese & Ge, 2004;Watanabe et al, 2013;Yeatman et al, 2014). However, there is still inconsistency between studies in terms of the nature of the myelin-age relationships, where some studies also report a linear decline with age for these quantitative metrics (Callaghan et al, 2014;Cherubini et al, 2009), while other studies have observed quadratic associations between age and myelin, with peak myelin varying between 30 and 50 years of age (Arshad et al, 2016;Ge et al, 2002;Inglese & Ge, 2004;Watanabe et al, 2013;Yeatman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Possible Biological and Functional Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, only few studies used MWI to study healthy myelin maturation. However, there is still inconsistency between studies in terms of the nature of the myelin-age relationships, where some studies also report a linear decline with age for these quantitative metrics (Callaghan et al, 2014;Cherubini et al, 2009), while other studies have observed quadratic associations between age and myelin, with peak myelin varying between 30 and 50 years of age (Arshad et al, 2016;Ge et al, 2002;Inglese & Ge, 2004;Watanabe et al, 2013;Yeatman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Possible Biological and Functional Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current scientific consensus is that fundamental differences exist in brain structure and function possibly in response to sexually selective evolutionary pressures (Cahill, 2014a). Brain differences between sexes have been shown in terms of neurodevelopmental trajectories (Lenroot et al, 2007), structural morphometry (Clayton and Collins, 2014; Luders et al, 2009; Peelle et al, 2012; Watanabe et al, 2013), connectivity (Cahill, 2014b; Duarte-Carvajalino et al, 2012; Gong et al, 2015; Ingalhalikar et al, 2014), and molecular biology (Al Nadaf et al, 2010; Cahill, 2006; Jazin and Cahill, 2010; Wu et al, 2014). Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrate sex differences in many natural history features, including age of first use, rate of drug consumption escalation, quantity consumed, affect, and behavior (Becker et al, 2012; Eaton et al, 2012; Hernandez-Avila et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%