2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2008.922181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multispectral Co-Occurrence With Three Random Variables in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Cancer

Abstract: Presented is a new computer-aided multispectral image processing method which is used in three spatial dimensions and one spectral dimension where the dynamic, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance parameter maps derived from voxel-wise model-fitting represent the spectral dimension. The method is based on co-occurrence analysis using a 3-D window of observation which introduces an automated identification of suspicious lesions. The co-occurrence analysis defines 21 different statistical features, a subset of w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a fourdimensional co-occurrence texture analysis approach (considering signal intensity variation over time) [22] and a multispectral co-occurrence analysis with three random variables (defined by three pharmacokinetic parameters) [23] were proposed for voxel classificationbased segmentation of the malignant breast tissue. These approaches yielded promising results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a fourdimensional co-occurrence texture analysis approach (considering signal intensity variation over time) [22] and a multispectral co-occurrence analysis with three random variables (defined by three pharmacokinetic parameters) [23] were proposed for voxel classificationbased segmentation of the malignant breast tissue. These approaches yielded promising results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on individual subjects, probability thresholds cannot be applied universally. In contrast, the results of Kale et al (2008) indicated that a threshold of 40% -50% is appropriate in general.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Kale et al (2008) showed that a classifier trained and evaluated using axially-acquired data achieved a similar level of performance when evaluated on unseen sagitally-acquired data. This robustness likely stems from the fact that the algorithm assesses the co-occurence of fitted Brix model parameters for neighbouring voxels, rather than assessing spatial co-occurrence as in Fusco & Sansone (2012).…”
Section: Methods Based On Voxel-wise Classificationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations