2012
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2012.699015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multispecies remote sensing measurements of vehicle emissions on Sherman Way in Van Nuys, California

Abstract: As part of the 2010 Van Nuys tunnel study, researchers from the University of Denver measured on-road fuel-specific light-duty vehicle emissions from nearly 13,000 vehicles on Sherman Way (0.4 miles west of the tunnel) in Van Nuys, California, with its multispecies Fuel Efficiency Automobile Test (FEAT) remote sensor a week ahead of the tunnel measurements. The remote sensing mean gram per kilogram carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), and oxide of nitrogen (NO x ) measurements are 8.9% lower, 41% higher, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although California light-duty gasoline vehicle NO x standards were about 25% lower during most of the decade prior to 1994, the contemporary contributions of this portion of the fleet are likely related to emissions of high emitters rather than the original emission standards. University of Denver estimated from RSD measurements that more than a third of the current Sherman Way total emissions of CO and HC are contributed by less than 1% of the fleet and half of the total measured CO, HC, and NO was produced by 2.0%, 2.1%, and 5.0%, respectively, of the 13,000 measurements (Bishop et al, 2012). For these reasons, the potential differences in the contemporary inuse vehicle fleet that might be attributable to differences in the Federal and California programs are difficult to quantify.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although California light-duty gasoline vehicle NO x standards were about 25% lower during most of the decade prior to 1994, the contemporary contributions of this portion of the fleet are likely related to emissions of high emitters rather than the original emission standards. University of Denver estimated from RSD measurements that more than a third of the current Sherman Way total emissions of CO and HC are contributed by less than 1% of the fleet and half of the total measured CO, HC, and NO was produced by 2.0%, 2.1%, and 5.0%, respectively, of the 13,000 measurements (Bishop et al, 2012). For these reasons, the potential differences in the contemporary inuse vehicle fleet that might be attributable to differences in the Federal and California programs are difficult to quantify.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of RSD and model emission factors RSD measurements were included in the study to examine the distribution of emissions in the local fleet of light-duty vehicles (Bishop et al, 2012). As configured for this study, the RSD could not detect elevated exhaust plumes from trucks and buses.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Nmhc Emission Factors To Ambient Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean NH 3 emissions at Peralta show no apparent instances of urea overdosing and are almost 2 orders of magnitude below the average NH 3 emissions of light-duty gasoline fleets. 35,36 A 2011 Mack tractor with an SCR system was measured at both locations. At the Port, this truck's gNO x /kg of fuel emissions and exhaust temperature were 31.2 g/kg and 120°C, and at Peralta they were 0.3 g/kg and 230°C (solid symbols in Figure 5).…”
Section: −34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuel ethanol is mostly used as E10 in gasoline vehicles. Fuel-based emission factors for NO x , SO 2 , and VOCs from gasoline vehicles that are averaged across a representative vehicle fleet are available from roadside and tunnel studies [Burgard et al, 2006;Bishop and Stedman, 2008;Bishop et al, 2012;McDonald et al, 2012;Gentner et al, 2013]. To estimate the vehicle emissions per liter of ethanol, we have to multiply the emissions from 10 L of E10 times the fraction of the emissions that is associated with ethanol only.…”
Section: Emission Intensities Of Fuel Ethanol Refineriesmentioning
confidence: 99%