Multispecies justice: Climate‐just futures with, for and beyond humans

Abstract

In 2019, the climate emergency entered mainstream debates. The normative frame of climate justice as conceived in academia, policy arenas, and grassroots action, although imperative and growing in popularity across climate movements, is no longer adequate to address this emergency. This is for two reasons: first, as a framing for the problem, current notions of climate justice are insufficient to overcome the persistent silencing of voices belonging to multiple “others”; and second, they do not question, and thus implicitly condone, human exceptionalism and the violence it enacts, historically and in this era of the Anthropocene. Therefore, we advocate for the concept of multispecies justice to enrich climate justice in order to more effectively confront the climate crisis. The advantage of reconceptualizing climate justice in this way is that it becomes more inclusive; it acknowledges the differential histories and practices of social, environmental, and ecological harm, while opening just pathways into uncertain futures. A multispecies justice lens expands climate justice by decentering the human and by recognizing the everyday interactions that bind individuals and societies to networks of close and distant others, including other people and more‐than‐human beings. Such a relational lens provides a vital scientific, practical, material, and ethical road map for navigating the complex responsibilities and politics in the climate crisis. Most importantly, it delineates what genuine flourishing could mean, what systemic transformations may involve (and with whom), how to live with inevitable and possibly intolerable losses, and how to prefigure and enact alternative and just futures. This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Global Justice

Assembling a Cabinet of Curiousities: Using Participatory Action Research and Constructivist Grounded Theory to Generate Stronger Theorization of Public Sector Innovation Labs

“…The bricolage used in this project incorporated a collection of methodologies that: challenged Western ways of knowing by drawing on Indigenous, critical, and feminist paradigms that provided different views into what transformative innovation in the public sector might be or become; allowed for multiple truths to coexist; invited a researcher with an active role in the research questions; and co-created and engaged communities in knowledge production. This bricolage engaged feminist, Indigenous, antioppressive, and critical race theory lenses to challenge the ongoing and dominant Western, male, and colonized understandings of the "right" way to do research generally, and also the "right" way to research Western governments, which tend to reproduce narrow ways of knowing and being and limit thinking and exploration rather than open up transformative possibilities (Brown & Strega, 2015;brown, 2017;Celermajer et al, 2021;Charmaz, 2014;Kemmis, 2008;Kimmerer, 2013;Kincheloe et al, 2017;Kovach, 2009;Simpson, 2017b;Smith, 2016;Timmermans & Tavory, 2012;Tschakert et al, 2020).…”

How Australian environmental non-governmental organisations frame and enact climate justice

“…This dimension highlights tensions in global responses to climate change, with effective climate governance being hindered by political disagreements, climate change conspiracy theories and distrust in adaptation strategies 25 . While to the authors' knowledge no studies have speci cally analysed the extent to which ENGOs conceptualise relational climate justice, various studies have noted the importance of quality relationships in developing equitable climate change mitigation and adaptation responses 26,27 . Finally, of particular relevance for ENGOs, is transformative justice, which focuses on the social and institutional inequalities which drive and perpetuate climate change and responses to it, arguing for the need to remake these power structures 28,29 .…”

Climate change and agrarian struggles: an invitation to contribute to aJPSForum

“…Proponents argue that a focus on different dimensions of justice is key to addressing climate change (Gardiner 2011). Climate change goes beyond the biophysical and technical and must be seen through the lenses of inequality and injustice (Newell and Mulvaney 2013;Lynch et al 2019;Tuana 2019;Newell et al 2020;Sultana 2021), extending beyond the rights of people to those of the living world, with a multi-species conception of environmental and climate justice (Tsing et al 2020;Tschakert et al 2021).…”