1991
DOI: 10.1021/la00059a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisite lateral interactions and their consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Preliminary results for Cu(001) suggest that ⑀ 2 is indeed attractive, and that ⑀ 2 / ⑀ 1 is about 1 / 8; there are also indications of an attractive right-triangle trio interaction ⑀ RT with sizable magnitude (perhaps comparable to ͉⑀ 2 ͉, consistent with a priori expectations 25,30 ), but there is also a sizeable colinear trio interaction which is repulsive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…29 Preliminary results for Cu(001) suggest that ⑀ 2 is indeed attractive, and that ⑀ 2 / ⑀ 1 is about 1 / 8; there are also indications of an attractive right-triangle trio interaction ⑀ RT with sizable magnitude (perhaps comparable to ͉⑀ 2 ͉, consistent with a priori expectations 25,30 ), but there is also a sizeable colinear trio interaction which is repulsive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…5͒. In contrast to the ones considered heretofore, 23,24 these trio interactions must be orientation dependent: If the triangle points in one direction ͑say up͒, the interaction energy has a different value than if it points in the opposite ͑down͒ direction. Alternatively, one can separate out the average of these two values as an ordinary trio energy with full 6-fold symmetry ͑the main effect of which presumably is to renormalize the NN interaction 9 ͒; then we can write the new contribution as an antisymmetric term which changes sign with each rotation of the triangle by / 3.…”
Section: Orientation-dependent Three-atom Interactionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…24,80 Such interactions typically decay asymptotically as d 5/2 , where d is the perimeter of the triangle made by the three interacting adatoms. 81 While any particular trio interaction is expected to be weaker than the three associated pair interactions, the difference in the decay envelope is just a half power (5/2 vs. 2) for SS mediation.…”
Section: G Open Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%