2001
DOI: 10.1109/20.911833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multishot performance of an insulator in a laboratory electromagnetic launcher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser pulse heating also produced the same soft waxy epoxy pyrolysis product seen in the fired insulator specimen. Some of the features are similar to those reported by Gee and Persad [1] in the transition region.…”
Section: Results Summarysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Laser pulse heating also produced the same soft waxy epoxy pyrolysis product seen in the fired insulator specimen. Some of the features are similar to those reported by Gee and Persad [1] in the transition region.…”
Section: Results Summarysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There are several deep scratches adjacent to the delaminated area. There is also general damage that is similar that described in Gee and Persad [1] in the transition region: epoxy degradation and subsequent fiber removal, possibly by gas wash behind the high velocity projectile. There is no other indication of uniform mechanical damage to the insulator surface that would be expected from general mechanical contact with the moving projectile.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, G10 insulator was vulnerable to delamination damage due to projectile impact and rail compression in the complex in‐bore multi‐physics environment, which restricted the service life of the entire EMRL. Gee [12] found that G10 insulator was impacted by launch package with transverse acceleration, resulting in obvious surface damage as well as imperceptible internal damage. Watt [13] pointed out that G10 insulator suffered large‐scale surface damage from interaction with the projectile and had to be replaced after three or four shots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%