2016
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1190023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensory integration processes underlying speech perception as revealed by the McGurk illusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of the reported McGurk percepts can be used as a measure of the extent that perceivers tend to use visual information in audiovisual speech perception. That is, the increase of the McGurk proportion indicates that the perceivers tend to make more use of visual information (for review, see Alsius, Paré, & Munhall, 2018;Marques, Lapenta, Costa, & Boggio, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of the reported McGurk percepts can be used as a measure of the extent that perceivers tend to use visual information in audiovisual speech perception. That is, the increase of the McGurk proportion indicates that the perceivers tend to make more use of visual information (for review, see Alsius, Paré, & Munhall, 2018;Marques, Lapenta, Costa, & Boggio, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than forty years ago, McGurk and MacDonald (1976) published a remarkable (and now famous) example of visual influence on auditory speech perception: when an auditory stimulus (e.g., /ba/) was presented with the face of a talker articulating a different syllable (e.g., /ga/), listeners often experienced an illusory percept distinct from both sources (e.g., /da/). Since that time, McGurk stimuli have been used in countless studies of audiovisual integration in humans (not to mention the multitude of classroom demonstrations on multisensory processing) (Marques, Lapenta, Costa, & Boggio, 2016). At the same time, the stimuli typically used to elicit a McGurk effect differ substantially from what we typically encounter in conversation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important aspect to consider is that speech–gesture integration is an automatic process of extraction and combination of AV information to generate the percept of what the interlocutor intends to communicate (Soto-Faraco et al 2004b ). This process is so strong that mismatching facial and auditory information generates audiovisual illusions, such as the McGurk effect (McGurk and MacDonald 1976 , see Marques et al 2016 for a review). It is also noteworthy that in Drijvers et al ( 2021 ) the auditory stimuli were modulated in amplitude, whereas we modulated the pitch, since sound amplitude modulation was used to generate the panning for the perception of sound movement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%