2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensory integration and maternal sensitivity are related to each other and predictive of expressive vocabulary in 24-month-olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, despite previous work having found toddlers to be able to match congruent multi-sensory information (Bruce et al, 2022;Wojcik, 2013), the participants in our sample showed no significant looking behaviour indicating matching during congruent trials for affective multimodal information. This unexpected result may be impacted by the decision to include fewer congruent (six 10-s trials) compared to incongruent trials (twelve 10-s trials).…”
Section: F I G U R Econtrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, despite previous work having found toddlers to be able to match congruent multi-sensory information (Bruce et al, 2022;Wojcik, 2013), the participants in our sample showed no significant looking behaviour indicating matching during congruent trials for affective multimodal information. This unexpected result may be impacted by the decision to include fewer congruent (six 10-s trials) compared to incongruent trials (twelve 10-s trials).…”
Section: F I G U R Econtrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The MAAP (Bahrick, Todd, et al, 2018) and the IPEP (Bahrick, Soska, et al, 2018) both assess attention skills in the context of dynamic, audiovisual social (speech), and nonsocial (object) events, making them relevant to natural learning contexts of infants and children where people and objects move and can be both seen and heard. They have now been successfully used for predicting language outcomes (Bahrick, Todd, et al, 2018; Edgar et al, 2022, 2003), have been adapted for virtual platforms (Eschman et al, 2022), and are becoming increasingly used by researchers in developmental science (e.g., Bruce et al, 2022).…”
Section: Multisensory Attention Skills: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admittedly, there are other measures, such as sensitivity, that capture parents' attuned and adequate reactions to children's signals using a global rating scale. Although these measures have been found to similarly predict children's language outcomes (e.g., Attig & Weinert, 2020;Bruce et al, 2022;Elsabbagh et al, 2013;Leigh et al, 2011;Murray et al, 2016) SR interactions are often assessed as parent responses (usually the first response) that occur within a specified time window (e.g., 2, 3, or 5 seconds) following every child act (e.g., look to toy, look to parent, gestures, vocalizations) and are semantically relevant for the child act (e.g., labeling the toy the child looks to, imitating the child's vocalization). Most studies adopt a 2 or 5 s time window to distinguish parents' temporally contingent from non-temporally contingent responses (e.g., Baumwell et al, 1997;Benassi et al, 2018;Goldstein & Schwade, 2008;Miller & Lossia, 2013;Shimpi et al, 2012;Tamis-LeMonda et al, 2001).…”
Section: Definitions and Measurement Of Sr Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%